[OpenSIPS-Users] mid_register and its possible bad actions with De-REGISTER
Liviu Chircu
liviu at opensips.org
Mon Jan 8 09:40:13 UTC 2024
On 27.12.2023 11:38, Dmitry Ponomaryov wrote:
>
> All this to say, it might make sense to add the ability to disable
> this De-REGISTER, because with a new registration, we will still send
> it a registration with an updated contact before the main registrar
> times out, and there will be no problems, that is, for example, the
> following settings:
>
> modparam("mid_registrar", "outgoing_expires", 600)
> modparam("mid_registrar", "default_expires", 300)
Hello Dmitry,
From your scenario, it sounds like maybe you should enable AoR
throttling, not just Ct throttling? Because in Ct throttling, each
outgoing contact has a unique "ctid=" parameter, so it must be
de-registered from the main registrar on each contact replace, since the
replacement Contact has a new "ctid=", making it an entirely different
SIP URI.
On the other hand, AoR throttling goes beyond this and just makes sure
there is always 1 AoR registered downstream. So on a "contact replace"
operation, no SIP signaling should reach the Asterisk in that case.
Best regards,
--
Liviu Chircu
www.twitter.com/liviuchircu | www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2024 Valencia, May 14-17 | www.opensips.org/events
More information about the Users
mailing list