[OpenSIPS-Users] load_balancer usage counter
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at opensips.org
Mon Feb 5 10:58:41 UTC 2024
Hi Callum,
Just to be 100% sure I got this right - the exact issue you report here
is also (in a more detailed way) reported in 3297 HG ticket, right ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
https://www.siphub.com
On 02.02.2024 16:53, Callum Guy wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> I'm still working on this and was in the process of writing a second
> issue to discuss my findings from looking at the module. In essence we
> can see the profiles potentially being counted multiple times - both
> in the max_load calculation (lb_update_max_loads) and then again in
> the balancing code itself (get_dst_load).
>
> You are correct that I have multiple OpenSIPs in front of these
> freeswitch instances. I operate separate registrars and SBCs and these
> do not replicate data to each other. The main complication arises as I
> am gradually releasing this onto a busy system - callers are currently
> allocated to a specific freeswitch server using manually controlled
> logic and am aiming to use the load balancer to automatically
> distribute the calls, allowing instances to be easily added and
> removed without reallocating callers to devices. As the vast majority
> are not initially enrolled in the load balancer the calls are not
> being counted and therefore the test accounts all have zero calls in
> the profile and the call is being distributed to any instance rather
> than the instance which has the most available channels
> proportionally.
>
> I've just gone ahead and posted the issue
> (https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/3297) as you've responded
> - that might add confusion or clarity, I'm not sure yet!
>
> I think I need to take some more time to review the module and propose
> a solution that will work for my scenario but I'm happy to share more
> details of the setup if you are interested in helping me to find a
> solution that would work for both me and the community.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Callum
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 14:37, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org> wrote:
>> Hi Callum,
>>
>> I can confirm the module increments its internal load with each call, so
>> you are good to go. Still, I do not understand why using the FS
>> heartbeat here? are the FS servers receiving calls from other
>> destination than OpenSIPS too ?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> https://www.opensips-solutions.com
>> https://www.siphub.com
>>
>> On 30.01.2024 16:27, Callum Guy wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm implementing the load_balancer module on a very busy system where
>>> thousands of calls may arrive in a matter of seconds. The module is
>>> configured to receive heartbeats every 1 second from many freeswitch
>>> servers, I have this set as a low value to try and keep OpenSIPs up to
>>> date with the real call load, as close to real time as possible.
>>>
>>> All servers exist in a single group "channels" to keep the initial
>>> implementation simple. When I kick off the session I use lb_start(1,
>>> "channels", "rs") and if that destination fails I use lb_is_started()
>>> and lb_next() to select the next destination.
>>>
>>> With the high call rate I'm concerned that the load values acquired 1
>>> second ago will be used for the entirety of the following second which
>>> would likely lead to a highly imbalanced load. If 1000 calls arrive in
>>> that second I need them spread evenly over the freeswitch servers
>>> which can only happen if OpenSIPs is counting each call as its
>>> allocated.
>>>
>>> My hope is that the module increments its counters each time a call is
>>> allocated to a destination; however I have been unable to isolate the
>>> line of code which performs this operation so I'm reaching out for
>>> confirmation. I can see the module adding the dialogs to profiles and
>>> that a separate lb_count_call() method is provided for counting calls
>>> but I'm unclear on the exact usage although it certainly encourages me
>>> that this counting is taking place somewhere.
>>>
>>> Thanks for reading,
>>>
>>> Callum
>>>
More information about the Users
mailing list