[OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.

[Johan De Clercq]

No I don't.
what I find strange is that MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 is the default
value of net.core.rmem_max and net.core.rmem_default.

Op do 18 apr 2024 om 16:02 schreef Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com>:

> Are you calling drop() anywhere in your script?
>
>
>
> https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13
>
>
>
> Ben Newlin
>
>
>
> *From: *Users <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> on behalf of Johan De
> Clercq <Johan at democon.be>
> *Date: *Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 5:27 AM
> *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
>
> * EXTERNAL EMAIL - Please use caution with links and attachments *
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them
> (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)?
>
> Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535.
>
>
>
> Can somebody explain also what both flags mean.
>
>
>
> Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq <Johan at democon.be>:
>
> would it make sense to recompile with other flags ?
>
> Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535.
>
>
>
> Can somebody explain also what both flags mean.
>
>
>
>
>
> flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
> F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
>
> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>
> poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select.
>
>
>
> Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq <Johan at democon.be>:
>
>
>
> Guys,
>
>
>
> I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children.
>
> The worker load is very low.
>
> UDP queues are on 50 megs.
>
>
>
> when i query via the OS
>
> cat /proc/net/udp
>
>   sl  local_address rem_address   st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when
> retrnsmt   uid  timeout inode ref pointer drops
>
>   590: 03231D0A:13C4 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 413684019 2 ffff880074820bc0 0
>
>   591: 03231D0A:13C5 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 413766438 2 ffff880465e4a440 0
>
>   592: 03231D0A:13C6 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 412035865 2 ffff8803e5a56b80 0
>
>   934: 01231D0A:151C 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 26790 2 ffff88046c054840 0
>
>   935: 0201FFEF:151D 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 26787 2 ffff88046c054bc0 0
>
>   935: 01231D0A:151D 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 26791 2 ffff88046c0544c0 0
>
>  1972: 00000000:D92A 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 15506 2 ffff88046dce5040 0
>
>  5479: 00000000:E6DD 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 22811 2 ffff880465e4ab40 0
>
> 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 20572 2 ffff88086d020800 0
>
> 12075: 0100007F:00A1 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 20571 2 ffff88086d020b80 0
>
> 13320: 00000000:857E 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000   100        0 17515 2 ffff8800368ac780 0
>
> 15661: 00000000:CEA3 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
> 00000000     0        0 15505 2 ffff8800368acb00 0
>
>
>
> => no drops
>
>
>
> what worries me is that there are drop requests and they  go up when I
> query via the mi interface
>
> opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests
>
> core:drop_requests:: 198107
>
> opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests
>
> core:drop_requests:: 199157
>
> opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests
>
> core:drop_requests:: 204116
>
>
>
> I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low.
>
>
>
>
>
> so 3 questions:
>
> - what exactly is drop_request.
>
> - do I need to worry about this
>
> - how can I make them go lower.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20240418/247666c8/attachment.html>