[OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.

Johan De Clercq Johan at democon.be
Thu Apr 18 09:25:55 UTC 2024


would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them
(I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)?
Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535.

Can somebody explain also what both flags mean.

Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq <Johan at democon.be>:

> would it make sense to recompile with other flags ?
> Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535.
>
> Can somebody explain also what both flags mean.
>
>
> flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
> F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
> poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select.
>
> Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq <Johan at democon.be>:
>
>>
>> Guys,
>>
>> I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children.
>> The worker load is very low.
>> UDP queues are on 50 megs.
>>
>> when i query via the OS
>> cat /proc/net/udp
>>   sl  local_address rem_address   st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when
>> retrnsmt   uid  timeout inode ref pointer drops
>>   590: 03231D0A:13C4 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 413684019 2 ffff880074820bc0 0
>>   591: 03231D0A:13C5 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 413766438 2 ffff880465e4a440 0
>>   592: 03231D0A:13C6 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 412035865 2 ffff8803e5a56b80 0
>>   934: 01231D0A:151C 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 26790 2 ffff88046c054840 0
>>   935: 0201FFEF:151D 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 26787 2 ffff88046c054bc0 0
>>   935: 01231D0A:151D 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 26791 2 ffff88046c0544c0 0
>>  1972: 00000000:D92A 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 15506 2 ffff88046dce5040 0
>>  5479: 00000000:E6DD 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 22811 2 ffff880465e4ab40 0
>> 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 20572 2 ffff88086d020800 0
>> 12075: 0100007F:00A1 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 20571 2 ffff88086d020b80 0
>> 13320: 00000000:857E 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000   100        0 17515 2 ffff8800368ac780 0
>> 15661: 00000000:CEA3 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000
>> 00000000     0        0 15505 2 ffff8800368acb00 0
>>
>> => no drops
>>
>> what worries me is that there are drop requests and they  go up when I
>> query via the mi interface
>> opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests
>> core:drop_requests:: 198107
>> opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests
>> core:drop_requests:: 199157
>> opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests
>> core:drop_requests:: 204116
>>
>> I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low.
>>
>>
>> so 3 questions:
>> - what exactly is drop_request.
>> - do I need to worry about this
>> - how can I make them go lower.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20240418/4eee9e4a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Users mailing list