[OpenSIPS-Users] Stir ans Shaken - number is not in E.164 format

Wed Sep 6 13:35:06 UTC 2023

Thanks a lot Daren,
I have to contact this big french provider to explain its issue ;)

Le mer. 6 sept. 2023 à 15:24, Daren FERREIRA <darencrew at hotmail.com> a
écrit :

> We don’t have the same understanding of MAN and FFT rules as, for
> portability, only R-URI is changed, not the To, that should point to the
> called number.
> And, as To is the source of the TN, the TN shouldn’t contain the
> portability prefix, and, then, we don’t exceed the 15 numbers limit and
> E164.
>
> Then, MAN documentation always mention E164 conformity. One of the main
> rules of E164 is the maximum of 15 digits, so...
>
> So, it’s up to you to make things works as you intend to do. Good luck ;)
>
>
>
> Some extracts from MAN documentation as proofs :
>
>
> Règles techniques:
>
> Remarque sur la portabilité : l’ajout d’un préfixe de portabilité doit
> être fait uniquement au niveau de l’en-tête SIP Request-URI.
>
> Cahier de tests:
>
> Appel (fixe ou mobile) depuis un ORT1 vers un ORT2 en transit SIP qui
> retransmet vers ORT3 avec présence de header Identity valide. ORT2 ajoute
> un préfixe de portabilité pour ORT3 dans R-URI mais pas dans TO (TO n'est
> pas modifié)
>
>
>
> Le 6 sept. 2023 à 15:09, Mickael Hubert <mickael at winlux.fr> a écrit :
>
> Nop Daren, in France it's possible to sign with a portability prefix :(
>
> Le mer. 6 sept. 2023 à 14:53, David Villasmil <
> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> damn... it seems there's a new law in France to do stir/shaken...
>> Regards,
>>
>> David Villasmil
>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>> phone: +34669448337
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 2:38 PM Mickael Hubert <mickael at winlux.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> We are deploying it in France.
>>> In France on providers interconnections, we can see a format (made in
>>> France maybe ;) )
>>> prefix: +33
>>> portability prefix: 10200
>>> phonenumber national format without 0: 123456789
>>>
>>> ++
>>>
>>>
>>> Le mer. 6 sept. 2023 à 14:30, David Villasmil <
>>> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Is ST/SH being used other than the US? AFAIK it only applies to US
>>>> numbers, thus 10 digits, no?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 at 14:27, Mickael Hubert <mickael at winlux.fr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yep I found...
>>>>>
>>>>> if (end - start < 2 || end - start > 15)
>>>>> return -1;
>>>>>
>>>>> I have to modify this code.
>>>>> I will propose a PR.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot
>>>>> ++
>>>>>
>>>>> Le mer. 6 sept. 2023 à 14:25, Marcin Groszek <marcin at voipplus.net> a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Correction : maximum of 15 digits .
>>>>>> On 9/6/2023 7:21 AM, Marcin Groszek wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your number is to long
>>>>>>
>>>>>> E.164 is + [1-9]  and  {1-14} digits for total of 15 digits NOT
>>>>>> starting with 0
>>>>>> On 9/6/2023 7:16 AM, Mickael Hubert wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> I have an issue, when I verify a call with no E164 format (dest:
>>>>>> +3310200123456789)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *logs:*
>>>>>> Sep  6 13:39:48 am-scr-001 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[622409]:
>>>>>> ERROR:stir_shaken:check_passport_phonenum: number is not in E.164 format:
>>>>>> 3310200123456789
>>>>>> Sep  6 13:39:48 am-scr-001 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[622409]:
>>>>>> ERROR:stir_shaken:w_stir_verify: failed to validate Destination number
>>>>>> (3310200123456789)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *My configuration:*
>>>>>> # ----------------- module  stir_shaken ---------------
>>>>>> loadmodule "stir_shaken.so"
>>>>>> #----------- stir_shaken params -----------------
>>>>>> modparam("stir_shaken", "ca_list",
>>>>>> "/usr/local/etc/opensips/man_ca.pem")
>>>>>> modparam("stir_shaken", "require_date_hdr", 0)
>>>>>> modparam("stir_shaken", "verify_date_freshness", 60)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to the doc e164_strict_mode is disabled by default, so I
>>>>>> don't know why it doesn't work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *source of code: *
>>>>>>         if (_is_e164(num, e164_strict_mode) == -1) {
>>>>>>                 LM_GEN(log_lev, "number is not in E.164 format:
>>>>>> %.*s\n", num->len, num->s);
>>>>>>                 return -1;
>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have any help for me please ? I have to validate this format
>>>>>> of dest number.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards:
>>>>>> Marcin Groszek
>>>>>> Business Phone Servicehttps://www.voipplus.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards:
>>>>>> Marcin Groszek
>>>>>> Business Phone Servicehttps://www.voipplus.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20230906/4b613437/attachment-0001.html>