[OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPROXY / OPENSIPS

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Wadii,

I haven;t checked the implementation, but the rtpproxy_engage should 
take care of the 183 with SDP. Have you tested it?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
   https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Bootcamp 5-16 Dec 2022, online
   https://www.opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2022/

On 12/23/22 9:42 PM, Wadii ELMAJDI | Evenmedia wrote:
> hello , i do have a question related to rtpproxy module documentation.
>
> The doc describes that rewriting sdp body should happen during either 
> INVITE , 200 OK or ACK.
> In the case of SDP presence on invite <=> 200 , one should 
> rtpproxy_offer during the invite and rtpproxy_answer during the 200 OK.
>
> "Documentation : RewritesSDPbody to ensure that media is passed 
> through anRTPproxy. To be invoked on INVITE for the cases the SDPs are 
> in INVITE and 200 OK and on 200 OK when SDPs are in 200 OK and ACK."
>
> But sometimes opensips receives a 183 Session Progress containing SDP 
> before the 200 which i think is related to earlymedia .
> I think those sdp packets should also be rewritten with the right rtp 
> proxy ip/port. In which case the doc should mention "SDPs are in 
> INVITE and 200 OK /183 Session Progress".
>
> My second question : since we can handle most cases with 
> rtpproxy_offer/answer methods, what is the purpose of rtpproxy_engage 
> ? is it to ease the management i described above ?
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20230103/a04cd832/attachment-0001.html>