[OpenSIPS-Users] interaction between fix_nated_contact(), topology_hiding() and serial forking
liviu at opensips.org
Wed Oct 28 17:27:12 EST 2020
On 28.10.2020 18:49, Jeff Pyle wrote:
> First, I lose the updated Contact from fix_nated_contact() after a
> serial fork. Is this expected?
I would assume the `fix_nated_contact()` lump changes get backed up into
shared memory, then made available during the failure_route. Anything
else and IMHO it looks like a bug. Opinions welcome.
> Second, I've determined that if the Contact URI is not wrapped in <>,
> that's when I get the "second attempt to change URI Contact" error
> when running fix_nated_contact() in the branch_route. This feels
> like a bug.
This one is a known, documented issue. Long story short: you should
always call fix_nated_contact() _before_ topology_hiding(). See this
truth table for more info .
www.twitter.com/liviuchircu | www.opensips-solutions.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users