[OpenSIPS-Users] ACK Routing Issue

[Mark Farmer]

Thanks Diptesh

I'm using topology hiding, so now I have this:

if (has_totag()) {
                xlog("CUSTOM_LOG: in-dialog $rm has message flags: $mf and
branch flags: $bf");

                #Set correct SIP User-Agent Header
                if (remove_hf("User-Agent")) {
                xlog("CUSTOM_LOG: Setting SIP User-Agent on In-Dialog
Request");
                insert_hf("User-Agent: OpenSIPS\r\n");
                }

                if (!topology_hiding_match() ) {
                        xlog("CUSTOM_LOG: cannot match request to a dialog
\n");
                        send_reply(404,"Not found");
                }

                # handle hop-by-hop ACK (no routing required)
                if ( is_method("ACK") && t_check_trans() ) {
                        xlog("CUSTOM_LOG: ACK detected with valid
transaction - t_relay");
                        t_relay();
                        exit;
                }

I don't see a 404 going out so I think topology_hiding_match is working.
But it tries to send the ACK to itself on it's private interface (I have
mhomed=1).

ACK sip:+44XXXXXXXXXX at 10.150.50.72;did=e07.595f3776 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP PUB.LIC.IP.ADDR:5060;branch=z9hG4bKc219.d1f5b08.2
From: <sip:+441204860410 at PUB.LIC.IP.ADDR;user=phone>;tag=gK0c801c8d
To: <sip:+44XXXXXXXXXX at 147.152.17.42>;tag=3800350621-1224267434
Call-ID: 543691539-3800350621-1514620980 at sbc-uk-bs13b.uk.sdin.bt.net
CSeq: 202841 ACK
Max-Forwards: 69
Content-Length: 0

Best regards
Mark.


On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 13:03, Diptesh Patel <diptesh.patel at ecosmob.com>
wrote:

> Hello Mark,
>
> Are you using Topology Hiding or Loose Routing?
>
> If you are using Topology Hiding then you need to match the topology using
> *topology_hiding_match()* first.
>
> It is great if you can share SIP packets.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> *Diptesh Patel*
> Software Developer
> Ecosmob Technologies Ltd,
> Ahmedabad
> Mo:*+919898962659*
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:00 PM Mark Farmer <farmorg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> I've upgraded an OpenSIPS box to 3.1 and am now seeing an issue with
>> ACK's trying to route to an incorrect IP - in this case our own advertised
>> IP.
>>
>> I think I'm right in saying that PRACK's & ACK's are treated equally and
>> should route in the same manner? However, PRACK's are routing correctly.
>>
>> I have this:
>>
>> if (has_totag()) {
>>                 ---
>>
>>                 # handle hop-by-hop ACK (no routing required)
>>                 #if ( is_method("ACK") && t_check_trans() ) {
>>                 if (is_method("ACK")) {
>>                         t_relay();
>>                         exit;
>>                 }
>> ---
>>
>> Thanks for any ideas!
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
> *Disclaimer*
> In addition to generic Disclaimer which you have agreed on our website,
> any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
> originator and do not necessarily represent those of the Company or its
> sister concerns. Any liability (in negligence, contract or otherwise)
> arising from any third party taking any action, or refraining from taking
> any action on the basis of any of the information contained in this email
> is hereby excluded.
>
> *Confidentiality*
> This communication (including any attachment/s) is intended only for the
> use of the addressee(s) and contains information that is PRIVILEGED AND
> CONFIDENTIAL. Unauthorized reading, dissemination, distribution, or copying
> of this communication is prohibited. Please inform originator if you have
> received it in error.
>
> *Caution for viruses, malware etc.*
> This communication, including any attachments, may not be free of viruses,
> trojans, similar or new contaminants/malware, interceptions or
> interference, and may not be compatible with your systems. You shall carry
> out virus/malware scanning on your own before opening any attachment to
> this e-mail. The sender of this e-mail and Company including its sister
> concerns shall not be liable for any damage that may incur to you as a
> result of viruses, incompleteness of this message, a delay in receipt of
> this message or any other computer problems.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>


-- 
Mark Farmer
farmorg at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200605/f6835a4c/attachment.html>