[OpenSIPS-Users] drouting gateway status with route_to_gw()

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Jeff,

Yeah, the route_to_gw() gives you raw, low level access to the routing, 
so the whole soring and filtering mechanisms are skipped. This is why 
the status is not checked, but it makes sense, as time as you can 
specify a list of GWs. Could you open a bug report on this please ?

About fetching the status of a GW from script, no there is no such 
mechanism for now. Normally it should be needed (if we fix the above 
issue, right?)

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
   https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit, Amsterdam, May 2020
   https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2020Amsterdam/

On 4/7/20 3:57 PM, Jeff Pyle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On v2.4.7 I'm using route_to_gw() to load routing for a particular 
> gateway.  It works well.  It also works when the gateway is in an 
> "Inactive" status, which surprises me.  I would expect the function to 
> return with an error code in that scenario, or at least have the 
> option to achieve that behavior.
>
> I don't see any mention in the documentation of a way to manually 
> check the status of a gateway from the script (only from MI).  Is there?
>
> Perhaps the gateway status is taken into consideration only with 
> do_routing()?  If that's the case, I'm wondering if I can emulate 
> route_to_gw() with do_routing() while specifying a gw_whitelist of 
> only the gateway I'm interested in routing to.
>
> I thought I'd ask the experts before I get crazy with it.
>
>
> - Jeff
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200407/a5b84f7d/attachment-0001.html>