[OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?

[solarmon]

Thanks all.

Apologies for my confusion and misunderstanding.

I have now tried it, and it does indeed work in the way I want.

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 14:33, David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think he’s just confused thinking that would change the reply TO THE
> provider. But this is not the case, the reply 183 comes FROM the provider
> and by “intercepting” it and changing it to 180, it’s the 180 what goes to
> the caller.
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 14:26, Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com> wrote:
>
>> You are trying to change a reply because the 183 response is a reply to
>> the INVITE. It is not the final reply, but it is still a reply. In fact,
>> the change_reply_status  function explicitly does not allow you to change
>> final replies, only provisional replies like 1xx.
>>
>>
>>
>> You need to use an onreply_route [1], either the global one or a
>> transaction one using t_on_reply [2], and the in that reply route you will
>> check if the response is 183 (t_check_status [3]) and if it is use
>> change_reply_status to change it to a 180.
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-Routes-2-4#toc4
>>
>> [2] https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.4.x/tm.html#func_t_on_reply
>>
>> [3]
>> https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.4.x/tm.html#func_t_check_status
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ben Newlin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Users <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> on behalf of David
>> Villasmil <david.villasmil.work at gmail.com>
>> *Reply-To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 5:42 AM
>> *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?
>>
>>
>>
>> That’s exactly what it does. You might want to check for the absence of
>> sdp with
>>
>>
>>
>> if(has_body("application/sdp"))
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 10:03, solarmon <solarmon at one-n.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Had a quick look at the change_reply_status() function and I'm a bit
>> unsure as it suitability for what I am wanting to do.
>>
>>
>>
>> Our setup has opensips sitting between our system and a SIP provider. The
>> 183 is coming from SIP provider and I would like to convert this to 180
>> before passing it on to our system.
>>
>>
>>
>> The documentation for change_reply_status() suggest it is used to
>> "Intercept a SIP reply". I am not looking to change a 'reply' to the SIP
>> provider, or to our system. I want to convert the 183 message from the SIP
>> provider and pass it on as 180 to our system.
>>
>>
>>
>> Will this  change_reply_status() function allow us to do that?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 14:23, solarmon <solarmon at one-n.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks. I forgot to say that I'm using openSIPS 2.4.x, but the same
>> function is available for it too:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.4.x/sipmsgops.html#change_reply_status
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the tip!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Image removed by sender.]
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>
>> Virus-free. www.avg.com
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 14:00, Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think you are looking for this:
>> https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/3.0.x/sipmsgops.html#change_reply_status
>>
>>
>>
>> Ben Newlin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Users <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> on behalf of solarmon <
>> solarmon at one-n.co.uk>
>> *Reply-To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
>> *Date: *Monday, October 7, 2019 at 5:15 AM
>> *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
>> *Subject: *[OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Our system connected to openSIPS is not handling 183 (with and without
>> SDP) very well and is non-trivial for us to try to change the behavior. If
>> we receive an initial 183 without SDP, it does not processed a subsequent
>> 183 with SDP.
>>
>>
>>
>> We would like to explore how 183 (with and without SDP) can be converted
>> to 180 (with and without SDP) see if this can resolve our issues. Can this
>> be achieved and are there any examples of how this could be done?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance for any help.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Error! Filename not specified.*
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>
>> Virus-free. www.avg.com
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> David Villasmil
>>
>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>>
>> phone: +34669448337
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> --
> Regards,
>
> David Villasmil
> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
> phone: +34669448337
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20191010/a048e94a/attachment-0001.html>