[OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?

[solarmon]

Hi,

Had a quick look at the change_reply_status() function and I'm a bit unsure
as it suitability for what I am wanting to do.

Our setup has opensips sitting between our system and a SIP provider. The
183 is coming from SIP provider and I would like to convert this to 180
before passing it on to our system.

The documentation for change_reply_status() suggest it is used to
"Intercept a SIP reply". I am not looking to change a 'reply' to the SIP
provider, or to our system. I want to convert the 183 message from the SIP
provider and pass it on as 180 to our system.

Will this  change_reply_status() function allow us to do that?

On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 14:23, solarmon <solarmon at one-n.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks. I forgot to say that I'm using openSIPS 2.4.x, but the same
> function is available for it too:
>
>
> https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.4.x/sipmsgops.html#change_reply_status
>
>
> Thanks for the tip!
>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.
> www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_-6109930205533376420_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 14:00, Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com> wrote:
>
>> I think you are looking for this:
>> https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/3.0.x/sipmsgops.html#change_reply_status
>>
>>
>>
>> Ben Newlin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Users <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> on behalf of solarmon <
>> solarmon at one-n.co.uk>
>> *Reply-To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
>> *Date: *Monday, October 7, 2019 at 5:15 AM
>> *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
>> *Subject: *[OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Our system connected to openSIPS is not handling 183 (with and without
>> SDP) very well and is non-trivial for us to try to change the behavior. If
>> we receive an initial 183 without SDP, it does not processed a subsequent
>> 183 with SDP.
>>
>>
>>
>> We would like to explore how 183 (with and without SDP) can be converted
>> to 180 (with and without SDP) see if this can resolve our issues. Can this
>> be achieved and are there any examples of how this could be done?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance for any help.
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Image removed by sender.]
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>
>> Virus-free. www.avg.com
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20191009/af2dd446/attachment.html>