[OpenSIPS-Users] Accounting BYE response

Fri Sep 21 08:07:49 EDT 2018

Bogdan,

Yes, as per the script example I provided originally I am arming failure_route always in local_route and setting the acc_extra variable in failure_route. Even in the case where the first BYE response is a failure, the acc_extra variable is not being set. This seems to indicate the dialog is being terminated prior to the call to the failure route.

Ben Newlin

From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
Date: Friday, September 21, 2018 at 5:31 AM
To: Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com>, OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Accounting BYE response

Hi Ben,

The Dialog is not terminated (as status) with the first successful BYE reply, but with the first reply (whatever the status is). Even if both caller and callee BYE will turn into 408 or 481, the first to fire will terminate the dialog session. But you say that if failure_route is triggered for both BYEs, you still see no acc extra data (even if at first one should have been executed before dialog termination) ?

Best regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer

  http://www.opensips-solutions.com

OpenSIPS Bootcamp 2018

  http://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_Bootcamp_2018/
On 09/20/2018 06:57 PM, Ben Newlin wrote:
Bogdan,

This is a good point and I did consider that. However, this only makes sense in the case where there is a successful response prior to the error response. As I noted I have seen this occur when both parties reply to the BYE with a 481 response. If the Dialog and ACC modules were triggering on the first BYE reply received, then my flag should still be getting set in this case as the first reply is guaranteed to be a failure.

Is it possible the dialog termination and CDR generation are being triggered prior to the failure_route callback? If so, are they also triggered prior to a reply_route callback? Would it make sense to delay the dialog termination until after failure_route processing to allow the script to make final adjustments to the CDR such as this?

Ben Newlin

From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org><mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>
Date: Thursday, September 20, 2018 at 11:42 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org><mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>, Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com><mailto:Ben.Newlin at genesys.com>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Accounting BYE response

Hi Ben,

The issue is a bit more complex. When generating the BYE requests, the dialog module triggers the event of call terminated when it gets back the first final reply (to any of the BYEs). And ACC module generates the CDR when the dialog is terminated.

So, the second BYE (which probably ends with timeout) ends in failure route (and set the acc extra) *after* the call was terminated and the CDR generated.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer

  http://www.opensips-solutions.com

OpenSIPS Bootcamp 2018

  http://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_Bootcamp_2018/
On 09/08/2018 01:00 AM, Ben Newlin wrote:
David,

I agree that there are better ways to do billing, but I must work within the constraints of the larger system of which I am only a part.

We do use some other techniques to detect “stuck” calls, including the (fairly) new Re-Invite pinging mechanism of the dialog module. We do not process the audio, so silence detection is not possible.

It is a very small number of calls that are affected by this, hopefully none now that we have the pinging in place, but I am still interested in the answer to the question. It seems to me there could be other use cases for modifying the CDR based on the response to a BYE, whether generated from OpenSIPS or not.

Ben Newlin

From: Users <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org><mailto:users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> on behalf of David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work at gmail.com><mailto:david.villasmil.work at gmail.com>
Reply-To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org><mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>
Date: Friday, September 7, 2018 at 5:53 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org><mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Accounting BYE response

I think you should take care of this on your gateway. For example, using freeswitch or asterisk, you can check for rtps, and when the other end stops sending rtps for 30 seconds (configurable) it will tear down the call properly.

Unless you're using a rtp-proxy with opensips which can do this (most can), that's the way to do this. Anything else is just duct-taping.

My opinion after 20 years on voip.

Hope that helps.

David

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018, 21:43 Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com<mailto:Ben.Newlin at genesys.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I am having an issue trying to add values to accounting based on the response to the BYE request.

We use the dialog timeout mechanism to terminate long calls in our system. In some cases, these are “valid” calls that remained connected for too long due to some error elsewhere in the application. But sometimes one or both ends of the call believe they have disconnected, but we did not receive or process the disconnect, due to a malformed BYE or a network disruption. In these cases, when the Dialog timeout is reached and OpenSIPS generates a BYE to both parties, they will respond with a 481.

What I want is to set a CDR flag on receipt of that 481 to indicate that there was an error and the calculated call time may not be correct. But it seems that any accounting flags set after the BYE is sent are not honored. Is there any way to accomplish this?

This is my attempt:

failure_route[local_failure]
{
  $acc_extra(disconnect_error) = "true";
}

local_route
{
  t_on_failure("local_failure");
}

Ben Newlin
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________

Users mailing list

Users at lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>

http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180921/337d1716/attachment-0001.html>