[OpenSIPS-Users] topology_hinding & load_balancer

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Mirko,

I suspect you messed up the routing for sequential requests when you 
added the TH. And if the sequential requests are not properly handled 
anymore from dialog perspective, the dialog module will not be able to 
count the ongoing calls, so the balancing process will get broken.

Have you added/replaced the "loose_route()" with 
"topology_hiding_match()" in your script ?

If you do "dlg_list" do you see the calls in state 4 (established) ?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
   http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2018
   http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam

On 03/06/2018 04:42 PM, Mirko Csiky wrote:
> Hi community,
> since we activated the topology hiding module in our load_balance test 
> scenario (sipp uac -> opensips & load_balance ->  5x - sipp uas), load 
> balance functionality always choose the same destination (from 5 
> possible). I can not see the link between topology_hiding & 
> load_balance_destination_choice, why is it so ?
> Does anyone have experience with topology_hiding&load_balance  / 
> workaround-idea ?
> best regards
> Mirko
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180312/2abdf961/attachment.html>