[OpenSIPS-Users] Choosing the latest version
Liviu Chircu
liviu at opensips.org
Wed Mar 7 10:08:32 EST 2018
Hi John,
Yes, we have also solved the "extraneous pinging" problem, both with the
internal and NoSQL storage variants of the distributed usrloc. It is
only a matter of shipping the code now. I will definitely make sure to
update you as we push code and docs for the areas you're interested in.
Best regards,
Liviu Chircu
OpenSIPS Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 07.03.2018 16:20, John Quick wrote:
> Thanks Liviu,
>
> What you say makes sense. It looks like I should wait for v2.4 to reach a
> more stable state. I hope my customer can wait.
> Is the Clusterer module completely changed in v2.4 or just tweaked and
> improved? I'm wondering if I can do some preliminary work now using v2.3
>
> I've been using older versions (in fact v1.11) to build simple edge/core
> test rig, then adding a Path header at the edge before relaying the REGISTER
> request to the core Registrar.
> It is challenging to know what Record-Route header to add when a call is
> made to the registered device, especially if it is behind NAT. Replicating
> the path field internally seems a good option for backup nodes, but have you
> also solved the problem of NAT pings only coming from the home core server
> and not from them all? If so, which version did that get into?
>
> Please could you email me when v2.4 gets the big update and feature freeze.
> Thanks.
>
> John Quick
> Smartvox Limited
> Email: john.quick at smartvox.co.uk
> Web: www.smartvox.co.uk
>
>
More information about the Users
mailing list