[OpenSIPS-Users] HEP Address Hostname error

Wed Apr 4 11:24:24 EDT 2018

Bogdan,

That is very good to know. I thought the siptrace module was using HEP.

But still, if I want to switch to HEP in the future, which I do, I need to be able to properly use a domain name in the proto_hep config. Any idea why that is not working as I described originally?

Thanks,
Ben Newlin

From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 10:56 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>, Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] HEP Address Hostname error

OK, it was a quick one :D...

The "duplicate_uri" from 1.11 was duplicating the traffic via SIP, not via HEP, so if you want to translate this setting, it has nothing to do with the proto_hep module, but still with the siptrace module like:

    /*sip trace id*/
    modparam("siptrace", "trace_id", "[tid]uri=sip:homer-hep.test.com:5656")

and use "tid" as tracing ID in the sip_trace function.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer

  http://www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com>

OpenSIPS Summit 2018

  http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam<http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam>
On 04/04/2018 05:50 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Ben,

Let me look quickly into this ;)

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer

  http://www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com>

OpenSIPS Summit 2018

  http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam<http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam>
On 04/04/2018 05:49 PM, Ben Newlin wrote:
Bumping this again. I can open a bug on Github if that is preferred.

Thanks,
Ben Newlin

From: Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com><mailto:Ben.Newlin at genesys.com>
Date: Friday, March 30, 2018 at 10:15 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org><mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>
Subject: Re: HEP Address Hostname error

Has anyone had a chance to look into this DNS issue?

Thanks,
Ben Newlin

From: Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com><mailto:Ben.Newlin at genesys.com>
Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 4:02 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org><mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>
Subject: HEP Address Hostname error

Hi,

While upgrading from 1.11 to 2.3, we have run into an issue with the parsing of the hep_id parameter in the proto_hep module.

In 1.11, we used the duplicate_uri setting in the siptrace module like so:

modparam("siptrace", "duplicate_uri", "sip:homer-hep.test.com:5656"<sip:homer-hep.test.com:5656>)

In 2.3, we converted this into the appropriate module config for proto_hep:

modparam("proto_hep", "hep_id", "[hid]homer-hep.test.com:5656;transport=udp;version=2")

However, this results in OpenSIPS complaining about receiving the wrong address:

Mar 26 19:59:58 [332] CRITICAL:core:mk_proxy: could not resolve hostname: "homer"
Mar 26 19:59:58 [332] ERROR:proto_hep:send_hep_message: bad hep host name!
Mar 26 19:59:58 [332] ERROR:siptrace:send_trace_proto_duplicate: failed to forward message to destination!
Mar 26 19:59:58 [332] ERROR:siptrace:save_siptrace: Failed to duplicate with hep to <homer:5656>

It appears the proto_hep module parameter parsing doesn’t allow for dashes/hyphens in the address portion, so it ends up with only a small part of the actual hostname of our Homer server.

Thanks,
Ben Newlin

_______________________________________________

Users mailing list

Users at lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>

http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>

_______________________________________________

Users mailing list

Users at lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>

http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180404/745c9a85/attachment-0001.html>