[OpenSIPS-Users] Tearing down the RTPProxy session for the current call

[Schoolhouse Filing]

Hi Razvan,

Thankyou for clarifying this, I was a little confused because the 
Opensips generated scripts that use rtpproxy for NAT do not call the 
rtpproxy_unforce() function.

I will add a call to trpproxy_unforce() in my route that handles BYEs 
and in the missed call (failure) routes.

Many Thanks,

Adrian.


On 08/11/17 10:47, Răzvan Crainea wrote:
> Hi, Adrian!
>
> Yes, you should be calling rtpproxy_unforce() when a BYE is received.
> You are right, if you do that, you won't be seeing too many "RTP 
> sessions ended due to media timeout".
>
> Best regardsm
> Răzvan Crainea
> OpenSIPS Developer
> www.opensips-solutions.com
> On 11/07/2017 08:59 PM, Adrian Fretwell wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was just looking at some statistics from my rtpproxy today and 
>> noticed that "RTP sessions created", "RTP sessions destroyed" AND 
>> "RTP sessions ended due to media timeout" all showed the same number.
>>
>> Although I am aware that the function rtpproxy_unforce() is 
>> available, in example routing scripts, I have never seen it used.
>>
>> Should I be calling rtpproxy_unforce() in my routing script at the 
>> end of a call?
>>
>> My assumption is that if I do, then the "RTP sessions ended due to 
>> media timeout" will be much lower.
>>
>> As always any advice will be gratefully received.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Adrian Fretwell
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171109/af4ab978/attachment-0001.html>