[OpenSIPS-Users] b2bua To header format
Răzvan Crainea
razvan at opensips.org
Mon Nov 6 05:53:40 EST 2017
Hi, Edwin!
In this case I think you are right, because the ;user=phone should be an
URI parameter, not a header parameter. Although the syntax is fine, the
semantics change - not sure if that bothers you though.
Please open a bug report to keep track of this issue and point it to
this discussion :).
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Developer
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 11/06/2017 12:29 PM, Edwin wrote:
> Hi Răzvan,
>
> After the change to b2bua we present the To header like this:"To:
> sip:+31123456789 at domain.com;user=phone
>
> After migration we still have problems with certain sip clients. In some
> cases a software update did the trick. I will make a github feature request
> to add the <> symbols anyway, even if it is following RFC.
>
> In case of adding the ;user=phone, i'm in doubt if you don't have to enclose
> the URI because of the semicolon. See RFC 3261:
>
> " The Contact, From, and To header fields contain a URI. If the URI
> contains a comma, question mark or semicolon, the URI MUST be enclosed in
> angle brackets (< and >). Any URI parameters are contained within these
> brackets. If the URI is not enclosed in angle brackets, any
> semicolon-delimited parameters are header-parameters, not URI parameters.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/OpenSIPS-Users-f1449235.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
More information about the Users
mailing list