[OpenSIPS-Users] port number in record-route

[Satish Patel]

is there a way i can re-write record-route port number?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov at evaristesys.com> wrote:
> Record-Route headers contain URIs, and like any SIP URI, they can contain a port component. If that port component is omitted, 5060 is presumed.
>
> On March 29, 2017 6:27:30 PM EDT, Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>what is the use of port number in record-route?
>>
>>I am having major issue with that look like we are running sip server
>>on different port to protect ourself from sip scanner we are using
>>non-standard port like 6060/7070 multiple port on single server so it
>>will failover to other port if firewall block them.
>>
>>I am seeing record-route adding first port in listen: directive for
>>example
>>
>>listen=udp:x.x.x.x:7070 udp:x.x.x.x:7070 udp:x.x.x.x:5062
>>
>>In this case my record-route always using 7070 in header default
>>recordless request coming on 5062.
>>
>>I found one more issue here someone posted while ago
>>
>>https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/sip-implementors/2001-March/000601.html
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>Users at lists.opensips.org
>>http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> -- Alex
>
> --
> Principal, Evariste Systems LLC (www.evaristesys.com)
>
> Sent from my Google Nexus.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users