[OpenSIPS-Users] Is there new information about "WARNING ...tm-utimer...delay in execution" nowadays ?

Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho pimenta at inatel.br
Mon Mar 20 15:10:35 EDT 2017


Hi.


I have seen again that behavior from OpenSIPS that generates lots of warnings, like below:


Jan 01 06:19:08 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:08 [1792] WARNING:core:utimer_ticker: utimer task <tm-utimer> already scheduled for 21873780 ms (now 21873970 ms), it may overlap..
Jan 01 06:19:08 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:08 [1792] WARNING:core:utimer_ticker: utimer task <tm-utimer> already scheduled for 21873990 ms (now 21873990 ms), it may overlap..
Jan 01 06:19:08 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:08 [1793] WARNING:core:handle_timer_job: utimer job <tm-utimer> has a 190000 us delay in execution
Jan 01 06:19:26 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:26 [1792] WARNING:core:utimer_ticker: utimer task <tm-utimer> already scheduled for 0 ms (now 21891940 ms), it may overlap..
Jan 01 06:19:43 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:43 [1792] WARNING:core:utimer_ticker: utimer task <tm-utimer> already scheduled for 21908780 ms (now 21909000 ms), it may overlap..
Jan 01 06:19:43 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:43 [1792] WARNING:core:utimer_ticker: utimer task <tm-utimer> already scheduled for 21909010 ms (now 21909010 ms), it may overlap..
Jan 01 06:19:43 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:43 [1794] WARNING:core:handle_timer_job: utimer job <tm-utimer> has a 220000 us delay in execution
Jan 01 06:19:43 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:43 [1797] WARNING:core:handle_timer_job: timer job <tm-timer> has a 220000 us delay in execution
Jan 01 06:19:43 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:43 [1795] WARNING:core:handle_timer_job: timer job <dlg-timer> has a 220000 us delay in execution
Jan 01 06:19:43 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:43 [1793] WARNING:core:handle_timer_job: timer job <blcore-expire> has a 230000 us delay in execution
Jan 01 06:19:49 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:49 [1798] WARNING:core:handle_timer_job: utimer job <tm-utimer> has a 370000 us delay in execution
Jan 01 06:19:49 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:49 [1792] WARNING:core:utimer_ticker: utimer task <tm-utimer> already scheduled for 21914930 ms (now 21915300 ms), it may overlap..
Jan 01 06:19:49 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:49 [1792] WARNING:core:utimer_ticker: utimer task <tm-utimer> already scheduled for 21915320 ms (now 21915320 ms), it may overlap..
Jan 01 06:19:49 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:49 [1794] WARNING:core:handle_timer_job: utimer job <tm-utimer> has a 30000 us delay in execution
Jan 01 06:19:49 colibri-imx6 opensips[1785]: Jan  1 06:19:49 [1795] WARNING:core:handle_timer_job: utimer job <tm-utimer> has a 30000 us delay in execution

When it happens, I can see that OpenSIPS is using the CPU almost 100% of the time. And such behavior prevents others softwares in my system to work without problems. I see 6 process with 'OpenSIPS name and each one using 11% of CPU, for example. Now, the unique solution is to reboot the system.  Otherwise, the system remains instable and OpenSIPS continues using the CPU much more than usual.

Is there some new information about such issue that I should to know nowadays?
Is my hardware under minimals requirements to run OpenSIPS?
Is my script opensips.cfg wrong?

My system has the following characteristics:

    CPU clock = 996000
    CPU model name    = ARMv7 Processor rev 10 (v7l)
     Hardware    =  Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)

                           total       used          free     shared    buffers     cached
    Mem:        251140     157208      93932          0        196      26304



In my script opensips.cfg I have:
-----------------------------------------------
tcp_children=4
tcp_keepalive = 1
children=4
#fork=no
auto_aliases=no

#### Transaction Module
loadmodule "tm.so"
modparam("tm", "fr_timeout", 90)
modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timeout", 120)
modparam("tm", "T1_timer", 3000)
modparam("tm", "restart_fr_on_each_reply", 0)
modparam("tm", "onreply_avp_mode", 1)

Any hint will be very helpful!

Best regards.





RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO
Inatel Competence Center
Software
Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170320/32c77e0d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Users mailing list