[OpenSIPS-Users] opensips $Revision: 4448 $

[Khalil Khamlichi]

thanks for your much appreciated help,
I am calling do_routing twice.

Here is my actual opensips.cfg :

route {
...
...

...
...
        if (has_totag()) {
               # sequential request withing a dialog should
               # take the path determined by record-routing
               if (loose_route()) {

                       # validate the sequential request against dialog
                       if ( $DLG_status!=NULL && !validate_dialog() ) {
                               xlog("In-Dialog $rm from $si (callid=$ci) is
not valid according to dialog\n");
                       }

                       if (is_method("BYE")) {
                               # do accounting even if the transaction fails
                               do_accounting("db|log","failed|missed",);
                       } else if (is_method("INVITE")) {
                               # even if in most of the cases is useless,
do RR for
                               # re-INVITEs alos, as some buggy clients do
change route set
                               # during the dialog.
                               record_route();
                       }
...
...

...
...
        $acc_extra(gwid)=$avp(gw_id);

       t_on_failure("GW_FAILOVER");

       do_accounting("db|log","cdr|missed",);
#NAT
       if (isbflagset(NAT)) setflag(NAT);
#NAT
       route(RELAY);
}

# END OF MAIN ROUTE


On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Răzvan Crainea <razvan at opensips.org> wrote:

> Hi, Khalil!
>
> Did you try to call the do_accounting() function for each leg going to the
> next gateway?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Răzvan Crainea
> OpenSIPS Solutionswww.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 01/15/2017 12:24 AM, Khalil Khamlichi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am testing opensips 2.2, 2.3 I have tried to configure acc module to
> save to db failed calls on drouting configuration, I have found that it
> does save only the first failed call (that is the first gateway) it does
> not save to database any other failures on second and third gateways that
> are tried for the call.
> is this the expected behavioure ?
> Thanks for your help.
>
> regards,
> kh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170116/097c7054/attachment.html>