[OpenSIPS-Users] opensips-1.11 storing data in memory issue .

Wed Apr 5 04:32:18 EDT 2017

Ohk. I got it.  You are saying,  if I am using two instance using single DB
then both the instance must have same scheme of writing domain.

      If I will make show, then everything will be fine.

      Yesterday,  I have done the same setup,  but still when contact are
present in the DB, in the same time they are not visible in memory.
        I am using same command
opensipsctl fifo ul_dump : to see the memory
opensipsctl dB exec " select * from location"  : to see the dB entry.

         The machine in which I am using single instance of opensips,  they
are absolutely fine.

On Apr 5, 2017 1:30 PM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at opensips.org> wrote:

> Bingo...that is your problem... Don't you think there is a bit of a
> conflict in having 2 OpenSIPS with different use_domain setting working
> over the same "location" table ? one OpenSIPS is writing records without
> domain, the other is complaining about reading record without :)
>
> Use different tables or databases.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>   OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>   http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> OpenSIPS Summit May 2017 Amsterdam
>   http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2017Amsterdam.html
>
> On 04/05/2017 04:35 AM, Sasmita Panda wrote:
>
> Yes...  Both are sharing same DB.
>
> On Apr 4, 2017 11:08 PM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at opensips.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Are the 2 instances sharing the same database ?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>   OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>   http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> OpenSIPS Summit May 2017 Amsterdam
>>   http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2017Amsterdam.html
>>
>> On 04/04/2017 06:59 PM, Sasmita Panda wrote:
>>
>> I am running two different configuration file in a machine with differ
>> port.
>>       In one configuration file,  use_domain is disable and in another
>> it's enable.
>>       In this case,  I am not able to see those contacts in memory which
>> are getting saved without domain.
>>
>>       Is that can be a reason? I have tried a lot to know the exact
>> reason.  But every time I am seeing different behaviour.
>>        The system in which a single configuration is running,  that's
>> working absolutely fine.
>>       I am stuck in this issue.
>> On Apr 4, 2017 4:49 PM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at opensips.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, if the "use_domain" is enabled for usrloc, OpenSIPS expects to
>>> find a domain set for all the records in the "location" table, otherwise it
>>> will ignore/discard them at loading time. The primary storage for
>>> registered contacts in the memory cache - OpenSIPS will perform lookups
>>> only in memory cache (and not it DB) - of course, unless you use the DB
>>> ONLY mode. You can check the in-memory registrations by "opensipsctl ul
>>> dump" Regards,
>>>
>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>   OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>   http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>
>>> OpenSIPS Summit May 2017 Amsterdam
>>>   http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2017Amsterdam.html
>>>
>>> On 04/04/2017 01:39 PM, Sasmita Panda wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bogdan ,
>>>        Yes , the domain corresponding to this username is empty . But
>>> the domain for all the contact is not empty .
>>>         When the domain for a contact is not empty and its present in
>>> the DB , I am not getting that in the memory . What could be the reason for
>>> this .
>>>        Another strange thing happening . When I am setting db_mode :2 ,
>>> even if a contact is not present in the memory (but present in db)
>>> the call get connected . I was assuming when there is no contact in the
>>> memory it should send  "404 Not Found" .
>>>        When I am running opensips in AWS linux , everything works fine .
>>> I am not seeing any issue regarding updating memory .
>>> But when I am running this in centos 7 , there is problem in updating
>>> memory in every refresh  .
>>>      So where was the problem . opensips is version is same every where
>>> . My config file is same everywhere . But still there is difference . Why
>>> this is happening ?
>>>
>>> *Thanks & Regards*
>>> *Sasmita Panda*
>>> *Network Testing and Software Engineer*
>>> *3CLogic , ph:07827611765*
>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org
>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Sasmita, The error means that at startup time (preloading the
>>>> usrloc content from DB into memory), OpenSIPS finds a record (in the
>>>> "location" table) with an empty domain field (username '1111') - could you
>>>> confirm this by checking your DB ? Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>   OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>>   http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>
>>>> OpenSIPS Summit May 2017 Amsterdam
>>>>   http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2017Amsterdam.html
>>>>
>>>> On 03/31/2017 01:06 PM, Sasmita Panda wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi  All ,
>>>>     I am using opensips-1.11 from long time . But today i faced some
>>>> issue .
>>>> when a username det rigistered , it givind some error in the logs like
>>>> bellow .
>>>> *CRITICAL:usrloc:preload_udomain: empty domain for user
>>>> 1111...skipping *
>>>> *    I am getting that entry in the DB but I am not getting anything in
>>>> the memory . Every call to this number failing with error 404 Not found .*
>>>>
>>>> *loadmodule "usrloc.so"*
>>>> *modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://yyyy:xxxx@localhost/opensips")*
>>>> *modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1)*
>>>> *    Other default modules are loaded also . It not giving any error
>>>> when starting . But while register its throughing such error . *
>>>> *      What the problem i am not getting it . This is happening in one
>>>> machine . In other machine the same config with same code is runnign fine .*
>>>> *Please help me if I am doing anything wrong .*
>>>> *Thanks & Regards*
>>>> *Sasmita Panda*
>>>> *Network Testing and Software Engineer*
>>>> *3CLogic , ph:07827611765*
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170405/03dfebbd/attachment-0001.html>