[OpenSIPS-Users] engage_rtp_proxy()

[Miha]

@Sasmita, totally clear :)

I asked wrong question :)


What is the difference between using engage_rtp_proxy() or using 
rtpproxy_offer(), rtpproxy_answer()?


tnx

miha


On 31/05/2016 14:39, Sasmita Panda wrote:
>         If you are using in INVITE , then it should be offer . Because 
> firstly we are offering media to someone . If its 200 Ok then it will 
> be answer because the 2nd party is answering the call .
>
>       If there is no sdp in INVITE but in ACK , then it will get 
> reversed . In 200 OK you should offer and in ACK you have to answer .
> This can be done in loop .
>
>      I hope I make you understand .
>
> */Thanks & Regards/*
> /Sasmita Panda/
> /Network Testing and Software Engineer/
> /3CLogic , ph:07827611765/
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Miha <miha at softnet.si 
> <mailto:miha at softnet.si>> wrote:
>
>     ok tnx. I understand documentation on wrong way.
>
>     But then, what is the difference with  using rtpproxy offer, answer ?
>
>
>     br
>
>     mia
>
>
>     On 31/05/2016 14:17, Sasmita Panda wrote:
>>     If there is sdp in ACK and u wanted to engage rtp proxy , the
>>      you have to write it inside ACK also ... By writing for INVITE
>>     cant help you to update ACK also . For 200 OK , you must write it
>>     in reply route .
>>
>>     */Thanks & Regards/*
>>     /Sasmita Panda/
>>     /Network Testing and Software Engineer/
>>     /3CLogic , ph:07827611765/
>>
>>     On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Johan De Clercq
>>     <johan at democon.be <mailto:johan at democon.be>> wrote:
>>
>>         put it also in reply route.
>>
>>         2016-05-31 13:42 GMT+02:00 Miha <miha at softnet.si
>>         <mailto:miha at softnet.si>>:
>>
>>             HI
>>
>>             if I use engage_rtp_proxy(), I can use it only on initial
>>             INVITE and opensips should automatically rewritten also
>>             200 OK and ACK with SDP, right?
>>             But when I am using this function, I can see from trace
>>             that only SDP for initial invite is rewritten, 200 ok
>>             with sdp is not changed. Must I do something else?
>>
>>             Rtpproxy is not running in bridge mode.
>>
>>
>>             tnx
>>             miha
>>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Users mailing list
>>             Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>             http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Users mailing list
>>         Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>         http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Users mailing list
>>     Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Users mailing list
>     Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160531/fcdedf5d/attachment.htm>