[OpenSIPS-Users] dispatcher with t_relay performance

[Satish Patel]

We have 200,000 CPS and more in future. Just worried about t_relay() and its performance. Any idea?

--
Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 6, 2016, at 2:44 PM, SamyGo <govoiper at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'd ask you to read difference between Load_balancer and Dispatcher module. Dispatcher module is not an accurate measure but it is the only option when it comes to load balancing REGISTER requests. 
> 
> Dispatcher is hence very light weight as compared to Load Balancer. For a 200 CPS calls Load Balancer or Dispatcehr won't be putting any bigger impact relative to the business logic itself. For example doing alot of DB queries, engaging various other modules etc these things really define how light or heavy your system is going to be.
> 
> Regards,
> Sammy
> 
> 
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Any thought on it???
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > We have dispatcher and we are using very simple code block like following
>> >
>> > if (method=="REGISTER" || method=="INVITE" ) {
>> >      ds_select_dst("1", "2");
>> >      t_relay();
>> >    }
>> >
>> > Does t_relay will keep all transaction in memory? and what will be the
>> > performance issue?  we have ~200k cps calls.. what will be the impact?
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160307/a0d01bfa/attachment.htm>