[OpenSIPS-Users] ACK after set_advertised_address contains wrong address in VIA header

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Ben,

You mean you used the record_route_preset ?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 27.06.2016 20:02, Newlin, Ben wrote:
>
> I have opened issue #917 on Github [1].
>
> I should mention that I have worked around this problem by deciding to 
> use Record-Routes instead of set_advertised_address. It is much 
> cleaner, even though it does expose my private IPs. However, I have 
> kept this configuration in case you need me to perform any tests or 
> get tracing/logs. Thanks!
>
> [1] https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/917
>
> Ben Newlin
>
> *From: *"Newlin, Ben" <Ben.Newlin at inin.com>
> *Date: *Monday, June 27, 2016 at 11:06 AM
> *To: *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>, 
> "users at lists.opensips.org" <users at lists.opensips.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACK after set_advertised_address 
> contains wrong address in VIA header
>
> Did you mean to say if you set it in request route?
>
> I should clarify that when I am setting the advertised address the 
> second time it is of course happening in failure_route as the first 
> request has failed at that point. Perhaps that is the issue?
>
> I will open a bug. Thanks.
>
> Ben Newlin
>
> *From: *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
> *Date: *Monday, June 27, 2016 at 10:41 AM
> *To: *"Newlin, Ben" <Ben.Newlin at inin.com>, "users at lists.opensips.org" 
> <users at lists.opensips.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACK after set_advertised_address 
> contains wrong address in VIA header
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> If you set the advertised host / port in branch route, it will have 
> impact over the entire transaction (all branches). So, any local 
> replies (CANCEL and ACK) that are constructed by OpenSIPS (for any 
> branch) will use the same set of advertised values. Which is of course 
> wrong. Let us come up with the fix (as idea and code).
>
> Could you open a  bug report on the GITHUB tracker, please ?
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 27.06.2016 15:45, Newlin, Ben wrote:
>
>     I always set the advertised address in request route.
>
>     Also as the original issue noted the second INVITE does go out
>     with the correct advertised address in the VIA. It is only the
>     local ACK for the failed second request that contains the wrong
>     address in the VIA. So set_advertised_address appears to be
>     working, but the local generated ACK is not using that address.
>
>     Ben Newlin
>
>     *From: *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
>     <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>
>     *Date: *Monday, June 27, 2016 at 5:37 AM
>     *To: *"users at lists.opensips.org" <mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>
>     <users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>,
>     "Newlin, Ben" <Ben.Newlin at inin.com> <mailto:Ben.Newlin at inin.com>
>     *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACK after set_advertised_address
>     contains wrong address in VIA header
>
>     Hi Ben,
>
>     Where in the script do you do the first advertise_address ? In the
>     request route or in a branch route ?
>
>     Regards,
>
>
>
>     Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>
>     OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>
>     http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>     On 25.06.2016 03:41, Newlin, Ben wrote:
>
>         I have run into the same problem that was described in this
>         previous post [1], however it doesn’t appear it was ever
>         solved at the time.
>
>         I am using the dispatcher module to route calls to external
>         carriers and I am using set_advertised_address to set the
>         outgoing public address prior to sending the request. If the
>         first destination returns failure, the ACK is sent correctly.
>         Then I select a different destination and set a different
>         public address using set_advertised_address. If this second
>         call also fails, the ACK that is sent out uses the first
>         advertised address, not the current on for the request.
>
>         Has anyone figured this out? I am using 1.11.6.
>
>         [1]
>         http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2014-August/029779.html
>
>         Ben Newlin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Users mailing list
>
>         Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>
>         http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160628/bf367228/attachment-0001.htm>