[OpenSIPS-Users] return code from perl_exec() versus perl_exec_simple()
Jeff Pyle
jeff.pyle at fidelityvoice.com
Thu Jul 7 17:29:30 CEST 2016
Hi Bogdan,
The patch gives errors.
I have two perl functions:
sub return1 {
return 1;
}
sub returnminus1 {
return -1;
}
In the OpenSIPS script I have:
route {
perl_exec_simple("return1");
xlog("L_INFO", "$retcode\n");
perl_exec_simple("returnminus1");
xlog("L_INFO", "$retcode\n");
perl_exec("return1");
xlog("L_INFO", "$retcode\n");
perl_exec("returnminus1");
xlog("L_INFO", "$retcode\n");
sl_send_reply("600", "Road Closed");
drop;
exit;
}
Syslog shows:
/usr/sbin/opensips[22354]: ERROR:perl:perl_exec_simple: function return1
failed to return anything
/usr/sbin/opensips[22354]: -1
/usr/sbin/opensips[22354]: ERROR:perl:perl_exec_simple: function
returnminus1 failed to return anything
/usr/sbin/opensips[22354]: -1
/usr/sbin/opensips[22354]: 1
/usr/sbin/opensips[22354]: -1
perl_exec() still works okay, but perl_exec_simple() gives errors.
- Jeff
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I think the difference is a mis. Could you please test the attached patch.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 07.07.2016 04:42, Jeff Pyle wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using 2.1 cloned from git earlier today. I notice when I use
> perl_exec_simple(), the return code is always 1, regardless of the return
> code at the end of the perl function. With perl_exec(), however, the
> return code matches the return code in the function. Is this difference
> intentional?
>
>
> - Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160707/a8c576bc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list