[OpenSIPS-Users] How to take control of Record-Routes header fields? Need remove one of two.
Eric Tamme
eric at uphreak.com
Thu Jan 14 22:18:45 CET 2016
Perhaps you should try to find out why there are now more RR headers -
it is likely that the request is spiraling through the proxy itself.
Generally speaking you should not remove the record route headers.
-Eric
On 01/14/2016 02:16 PM, Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho wrote:
>
> Dear OpenSIPS-Users;
>
>
> Suddenly my opensips started to add 2 Record-Routes header fields to
> messages it is handling. Ex: when forward a simple SIP-INVITE.
>
>
> One header field has a private IP and another has a public IP.
>
>
> I would like to take control of Record-Routes and then avoid opensips
> adding that one with private IP.
>
>
> Is it possible?
>
>
> If yes, when a SIP-OK arrives in a callee, the callee will send
> SIP-ACK to the public IP and then the OpenSIPS will receive it. If I
> let the header field with private IP there, it causes problem when
> opensips is behind a NAT, with callee, but the caller is outside the
> local network.
>
>
> Can I proceed removing one Record-Route or it is a bad idea?
>
>
> Any hint will be very helpful!
>
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO
> Inatel Competence Center
> Software
> Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160114/b54d7e9a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list