[OpenSIPS-Users] Is NATHELPER module enough in my case? Help please.
Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho
pimenta at inatel.br
Fri Jan 8 11:52:39 CET 2016
Ok Chiu Ching.
I also thought about to use a stun server, but I wasn't sure about it.
Now I'm sure that a stun server will help me and can be a solution.
Thank you very much!
RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO
Inatel Competence Center
Software
Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979
________________________________
De: users-bounces at lists.opensips.org <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> em nome de chiu ching cheng <ccchiou049 at gmail.com>
Enviado: sexta-feira, 8 de janeiro de 2016 07:56
Para: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Assunto: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Is NATHELPER module enough in my case? Help please.
I think you should enable stun function in mobile phone 2 , then it can sent public ip in contact header . Then I think nathelper module with sip proxy module would caused nat signaling problem be solved , but you should add media proxy function to solve media problem in nated circumstance.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho <pimenta at inatel.br<mailto:pimenta at inatel.br>> wrote:
Dear OpenSIPS-users,
First of all, happy new year.
I'm still reading about NATs, SIP proxies and SIP, to understand how to solve a question in my project. I'm not expert in TCP, IP, routers, NATs and networks. That is why I would like to get some help here. I guess I'm almost getting the point to solve it.
In my current network topology case I have:
Mobile Phone 1 on Internet
/ \ |
| |
| SIP |
| \/ Real IP (Internet)
NAT ------------------------------------------------
/\ | 'Nated' IP (Wan)
| |
| SIP |
| |
| |
| \/
ROUTER ------------------------------------------------
/\ | (Lan)
| SIP |
| |
SIP Proxy OPENSIPS
| |
| SIP |
| |
Mobile Phone 2 on local network
When Phone 2 calls Phone 1, everything is ok. Phone 1 is registered on OpenSIPS with 'Nated' IP, by someway. So, Phone 2 sends INVITE to such IP. When Phone 1 answers with SIP OK, the Contact header filed has the same 'Nated' IP. Then, Phone 2 can send the ACK to the correct path.
However, when Phone 1 calls Phone 2 and Phone 2 answer with SIP OK, Phone 1 can't send the ACK, because the Contact header field from SIP OK has the local IP for Phone 2.
It is true because when Phone 2 registers itself on OpenSIPS, the local IP is recorded in the local database table.
So I have the following questions:
1 - Can this problem be solved without using the Nat Traversal Module?
2 - Can NATHELPER module fix the Contact header field (as a I saw this module has functions related with it), when Phone 2 sends SIP OK to Phone 1? If yes, how can such module determine a 'good' IP to put in this header field?
3 - If Phone 2 uses a stun server, will such phone be registered on OpenSIP with a real IP, won't be? Could it be a solution too?
Any hint will be very helpful!
Thanks a lot!
RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO
Inatel Competence Center
Software
Ph: +55 35 3471 9200<tel:%2B55%2035%203471%209200> RAMAL 979
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160108/9b20dcee/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list