[OpenSIPS-Users] How to avoid increasingly memory comsuption with AVPs?

Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho pimenta at inatel.br
Fri Apr 15 15:50:11 CEST 2016


Hi.


After a stress test with my OpenSIPS and few user agent clients on-line, just sending SIP REGISTER messages (1 at each minute), not making calls, I saw this log:



Apr 15 10:09:20 [20441] WARNING:core:fm_malloc: Not enough free memory, will attempt defragmentation
Apr 15 10:09:20 [20441] ERROR:db_sqlite:db_sqlite_allocate_rows: no memory left
Apr 15 10:09:20 [20441] ERROR:db_sqlite:db_sqlite_convert_rows: no private memory left
Apr 15 10:09:20 [20441] ERROR:db_sqlite:db_sqlite_convert_result: error while converting rows
Apr 15 10:09:20 [20441] ERROR:db_sqlite:db_sqlite_store_result: error while converting result
Apr 15 10:09:20 [20441] ERROR:avpops:db_query_avp: raw_query failed: db0(usr_preferences) select Value from GeneralConfigurations ...


So, I suspect that I have codified something wrong in my opensips.cfg file.

More precisely, I have used some AVPs and I'm note sure if  such use is correct or if it is the cause of increasingly memory consumption.

For example, I have codified somethings like this:



1        if($avp(I_A) == NULL){
                 avp_db_query("select Value from GeneralConfigurations where Attribute = 'CONFIGURATION_INTERCOM_A_NAME'", "$avp(I_A)");
        }


.

.

.


2        if ($rU==$avp(M_TU)){
           $rU = $avp(M_T);
        }

.

.

.


3    if (nat_uac_test("34")) {
        if (is_method("REGISTER")) {
            fix_nated_register();
            setbflag(NAT);
            $avp(attr) = "in_another_network";
        } else {
            fix_nated_contact();
            setflag(NAT);
        }
    }


.

.

.

4                $avp(ContatoRegister) = $(ct.fields(uri){s.select,0,;});
                  if($fn != NULL){
                     avp_db_query("UPDATE location SET callerName='$fn'  where contact like '$avp(ContatoRegister)%'");
                }
                $avp(ContatoRegister) = NULL;




Could some of the 4 piece of codes above causes some increasingly memory consumption?


Any hint will be very helpful!


Best regards.



RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO
Inatel Competence Center
Software
Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160415/2be47d33/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list