[OpenSIPS-Users] Topology Hiding / 302

Pete Kelly pkelly at gmail.com
Mon Sep 28 13:58:04 CEST 2015


Done https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/656

On 28 September 2015 at 12:32, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
wrote:

> That is true Pete,
>
> Could you open a bug report on the GITHUB tracker please ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 28.09.2015 14:27, Pete Kelly wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28 September 2015 at 12:23, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pete,
>>
>> You mean that ideally the username part of Contact URI should be preserve
>> through TH ?
>>
>
> Yes, and also the domain, which would need to be preserved if the UAS
> wanted to 302 to a completely different URI?
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 23.09.2015 11:40, Pete Kelly wrote:
>>
>> This is something I have noticed for a while now and came across it again
>> the other day.
>>
>> Basically if you are using topology hiding and the UAS sends a 302, the
>> data (new $ru) in the Contact header is not persisted to the UAC, meaning
>> topology hiding is not valid in a scenario where a 302 may be found.
>>
>> Is there a known way to get round this currently (am I missing something
>> in the docs!)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150928/556b0404/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list