[OpenSIPS-Users] What choise? MediaProxy module or RTPProxy module?

[Nabeel]

Rtpproxy is only able to relay media (indirectly) through the server, so
this can't achieve what you want.

Some users have said Mediaproxy has ICE capability.   If that is so, then
ICE should be able to negotiate direct communication between some clients.
On 15 Oct 2015 18:36, "Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho" <pimenta at inatel.br> wrote:

>
> Hi.
>
>
> Today I'm searching for a solution that allows me to use OpenSIPS, SIP
> over TCP, end-nodes behind NATs and direct media.
>
>
> As someone pointed, I'm reading now about MediaProxy module.
>
>
> However, if I'm right, by using MediaProxy I will get only media relay.
> That is, MediaProxy does only provide media relay. Am I right?
>
>
> I need an way to implement direct media between the end-nodes, behind
> NATs. I want to avoid pass the media through the MediaProxy, due to
> performance reasons.
>
>
> Should I give up using MediaProxy and move to RTPProxy? Would it be a good
> decision?
>
>
> When it is better to use MediaProxy, and when it is better to use
> RTPProxy?
>
>
> Any hint will be very helpful!
>
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
> RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO
> Inatel Competence Center
> Software
> Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20151015/de909bcf/attachment-0001.htm>