[OpenSIPS-Users] What to choose: Nat Traversal, Media Proxy or Nathelper ?? I need a direction.

[Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho]

Ok. Great!

But, I'm using SIP over TCP. Even in this way could I use Media Proxy and ICE?


Best regards.


RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO
Inatel Competence Center
Software
Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979


________________________________
De: users-bounces at lists.opensips.org <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> em nome de Adrian Georgescu <ag at ag-projects.com>
Enviado: quinta-feira, 15 de outubro de 2015 11:03
Para: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Assunto: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] What to choose: Nat Traversal, Media Proxy or Nathelper ?? I need a direction.

You need MediaProxy with ICE mode enabled.

Adrian

On 15 Oct 2015, at 09:47, Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho <pimenta at inatel.br<mailto:pimenta at inatel.br>> wrote:

Dear OpenSIPS-Users,

I'm working in a project that needs to use OpensSIPS, SIP over TCP,  softphones behind NAT, and video transmission between the sip proxy and the softphones as direct media.

As I'm completely new to NAT traversing and direct media, I wonder what is the first module to study?

Nat Traversal, or Media Proxy, or Nathelper?

What of these 3 modules will be really necessary, to provide direct media, when using SIP over IP and peers behind NATs?

Any hint will be very helpful!

Regards.

RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO
Inatel Competence Center
Software
Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20151015/d018ca85/attachment.htm>