[OpenSIPS-Users] topology_hiding function and loose_route etc

[John Nash]

Hello Bogdan,

Thank you I will just ignore them. I have one more related issue. I am
using uac_replace_from in auto mode along with topology_hiding. In a case
when UA sends opensips a REInvite , my end carrier seem to completely
ignore the Reinvite. I noticed that From URI in original Invite is
different from the one sent in Reinvite (Only change is caller ID)....

Is there something I should know when mixing topology_hiding function and
uac_replace_from?

Regards

John



On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
wrote:

>  Hi John,
>
> The module complains of receiving in Early state a reply without "tag"
> param in TO header - something like that is bogus.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 15.06.2015 12:32, John Nash wrote:
>
>   I have modified my proxy config to support topology_hiding function of
> dialog module. But I see lot of dialog related errors like ..
>
> ERROR:dialog:push_reply_in_dialog: [487] reply in dlg state [2]: missing
> TAG param in TO hdr
> ERROR:dialog:w_validate_dialog: null dialog
>
>  I am just wondering if my configuration is correct. How functions like
> loose_route(); match_dialog();, Validate_dialog(), fix_route_dialog should
> be used in production environment to cover all cases.
>
>  From documentation I find code snippets explaining application for each
> function but how they all work together in topology_hiding function
> scenario?
>
>  PS: I can send my config in case someone needs to have a look.
>
>  John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150616/39373bc4/attachment-0001.htm>