[OpenSIPS-Users] Problem: INVITE port mismatch

[Albert Vallespi Ofertas]

Hello Aron,

Yes, we have tested also with force_send_socket("tcp:eth2_IP:5060") and it
happens the same.
Do you think I should use the command this way?

After a volume of correct calls, opensips degrades and start sending TCP
INVITES to a different port that the indicated in the r-uri.
We have test in so many ways with some of these instructions, but always
happened the same.

Thanks a lot for the answer



2015-07-13 13:39 GMT+02:00 Podrigal, Aron <aronp at guaranteedplus.com>:

> Have you tried using force_send_socket()?
> On Jul 13, 2015 5:35 AM, "Albert Vallespi Ofertas" <
> avallespi.ofertas at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello again,
>>
>> We have re-checked the case, and I think there is no relation with
>> "user=phone" parameter in the r-uri.
>>
>> We have verified that in our scenario, forwarding from UDP to TCP
>> opensips sends INVITE in the TCP side to a wrong port.
>> I think it changes origin and destination ports. This seems a opensips
>> bug.
>>
>> - Network1 is using UDP, and opensips listens at port UDP:eth1_IP:5060
>> - Network2 is using TCP, and opensips listens at port TCP:eth2_IP:5060
>>
>> 2015-07-10 19:46 GMT+02:00 Albert Ofertas <avallespi.ofertas at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi to all,
>>>
>>> We have a new opensips r.2.1 in a production environment where it is
>>> configured between two different networks.
>>> We are using always private networks, therefore there is not any NAT or
>>> similar.
>>>
>>> - Network1 is using UDP, and opensips listens at port UDP:eth1_IP:5060
>>> - Network2 is using TCP, and opensips listens at port TCP:eth2_IP:5060
>>>
>>> We have observed that when we forward an INVITE from Network1 to
>>> Network2 sometimes there is a port mismatch in the outgoing INVITE.
>>>
>>> This INVITE should go from opensipts TCP:eth2_IP:6xxxx (for example
>>> 63445) to the remote peer that uses TCP:REMOTE_IP:5060.
>>> What we have observed is that this INVITE many times and without a
>>> logical explanation mixes the ports.
>>> I mean, the r-uri is correct (example:  XXXXXX at REMOTE_IP:5060;transport=tcp;user=phone),
>>> but the message is sent via TCP with the ports crossed.
>>> The wrong INVITE is going from  TCP:eth2_IP:5060 to TCP:REMOTE_IP:6xxxx.
>>>
>>> We have observed that this incorrect behaviour in opensips is happening
>>> when we are using the parameter "user=phone" in the request uri.
>>>
>>> We have tested some minutes without the "user=phone" and we have not
>>> observed the port mismatch then.
>>>
>>> We must use the parameter "user=phone". This is a mandatory parameter in
>>> our case because we are sending always this INVITE to a MediaGateway that
>>> requires it to translate the uri and send the call to the telephony network.
>>>
>>> ¿Could you please help us to solve this issue?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Albert Vallespí
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150713/7664adbb/attachment.htm>