[OpenSIPS-Users] LoadBalance - Share resource count between group

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Mike,

So answer is no, they do no share - in the profile name we get the 
destination ID (which is unique) and not the destination IP.
IF you want, you can open a feature request on github tracker.

Best regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 03.07.2015 14:02, Mike Tesliuk wrote:
>
> [root at sipproxy1-R3 ~]# opensipsctl fifo list_all_profiles
> lbX41:: 1
> lbX31:: 1
> lbX21:: 1
> lbX20:: 1
>
>
> On 03/07/15 05:09, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Could you do a list_all_profiles MI command:
>> http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.11.x/dialog.html#id297069
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 03.07.2015 06:10, Mike Tesliuk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Bogdan,
>>>
>>> seems that the share is not working as you can see below
>>>
>>> Destination:: sip:177.43.X07.XX6:5060 id=33 group=2 enabled=yes 
>>> auto-re=on
>>>     Resource:: 41 max=42 load=0
>>>     Resource:: 31 max=75 load=0
>>>     Resource:: 21 max=64 load=0
>>>     Resource:: 20 max=112 load=0
>>> Destination:: sip:177.43.X07.XX6:5060 id=13 group=1 enabled=yes 
>>> auto-re=on
>>>     Resource:: 41 max=42 load=1
>>>     Resource:: 31 max=75 load=0
>>>     Resource:: 21 max=64 load=0
>>>     Resource:: 20 max=112 load=0
>>>
>>>
>>> i try to add the /s on the end of the resource name (41 is a gsm 
>>> carrier identification, so i try 41/s=42 ) but when i add this the 
>>> gateways dos not show on lb_list anymore.
>>>
>>> Im using on this gateway an old 1.9 version [ Server:: OpenSIPS 
>>> (1.9.1-notls (x86_64/linux)) ]
>>>
>>> i can update if neede as this is a new equipment, but i had made 
>>> this instalation a year ago, so this is why im using version 1.9
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/07/15 10:47, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The dialog profiles (used for counting the calls) are internally 
>>>> build using the resource name and the IP of the destination. So, if 
>>>> same destination (as IP) , same resource name, in different rows, 
>>>> for different groups, the same profile should be used in both cases 
>>>> (it will be shared). I say "should" as I never tried this case, but 
>>>> looking at the code it should share the load.
>>>> Just give it a try and let me know ;)
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>
>>>> On 02.07.2015 02:57, Mike Tesliuk wrote:
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that possible to share the count between two diferent groups on 
>>>>> loadbalance ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I will have the same sip-uri but i need diferent groups because i 
>>>>> need to use diferent gateways according with the originator, one 
>>>>> originator can have two gateways, the other can have just one, but 
>>>>> the resources need to be visible between groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that possible ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>