[OpenSIPS-Users] Fwd: Opensips + RtpProxy: media stream timed out while starting
Semyon Golubcov
thegolub4 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 22:16:33 CET 2015
*Misslink, https://gist.github.com/anonymous/d182c80070a14ef7c238
2015-02-17 23:13 GMT+02:00 Semyon Golubcov <thegolub4 at gmail.com>:
> Here is the clean UDP trace
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/399fc19e2b7465521cd3
>
>
>
> 2015-02-17 23:07 GMT+02:00 Semyon Golubcov <thegolub4 at gmail.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 2015-02-15 2:44 GMT+02:00 Semen Golubcov <thegolub4 at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> P.S. Here i was calling bob from alex on my own system, so both clients
>>> are using my own ip.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-02-15 2:42 GMT+02:00 Semen Golubcov <thegolub4 at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hello Eric. I captured the trace with the siptrace module, since it's
>>>> easier to capture tls packets with it. I hope it will do as good as ngrep.
>>>> Here it is:
>>>>
>>>> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/a9046cddd1058cf9ea35
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-02-14 5:26 GMT+02:00 Eric Tamme <eric at uphreak.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Or you could uh... Use UDP 5060/till you get your signalling sorted.
>>>>> ;)
>>>>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:23 PM, Semen Golubcov <thegolub4 at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean 5061? The packets are encrypted, i will try to capture them
>>>>>> with ngrep and decrypt with the private key using wireshark and post the
>>>>>> decrypted data to
>>>>>> gist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: Eric Tamme <eric at uphreak.com>
>>>>>> Date: 2015-02-14 3:47 GMT+02:00
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips + RtpProxy: media stream timed
>>>>>> out while starting
>>>>>> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The message about late back means it is probably not routing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Install ngrep and run
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ngrep -qtd any -W byline port 5060
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On OpenSIPS during the call. Paste the output to a gist on
>>>>>> gist.github.com and include the link in your next reply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Eric
>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Semen Golubcov <thegolub4 at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello. Should i answer you here or send my replies to the user list?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I looked up the sip trace and syslog, apparently there are no
>>>>>>> retransmissions i think and there is no messages about "no matching
>>>>>>> transaction exists".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg: method: <ACK>
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg: uri: <sip:53049768 at 92.xx.xx.xx(my_Public_ip
>>>>>>> (client) ):49190;transport=tls>
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg: version: <SIP/2.0>
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=2
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 232, <branch> =
>>>>>>> <z9hG4bKPjb29aaf78cf594541aeb97e0b801a4075>; state=6
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 237, <alias> = <n/a>; state=16
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_via: end of header reached, state=5
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_headers: via found, flags=2
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_headers: this is the first via
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:receive_msg: After parse_msg...
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:receive_msg: preparing to run routing scripts...
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:sl:sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In this example i was calling calling from one user to another on my
>>>>>>> machine (so the ip will always be the same for both clients). I guess here:
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg: method: <ACK>
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg: uri: <sip:53049768 at 92.xx.xx.xx(my_Public_ip
>>>>>>> (client) ):49190;transport=tls>
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg: version: <SIP/2.0>
>>>>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>>>>> DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The server get's the ack from my client, and than opensips says:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Apr 5 23:06:22 ser /usr/local/sbin/ser[6282]: DEBUG :
>>>>>>> sl_filter_ACK: to
>>>>>>> late to be a local ACK!"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does this mean that ACK is getting lost? I'll attach the syslog just
>>>>>>> in case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150217/4bb11940/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list