[OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA marketting scenario
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at opensips.org
Fri Dec 11 11:54:36 CET 2015
Hi Sebastian,
Razvan uploaded a fix for this problem - please check it.
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 31.08.2015 23:38, Sebastian Sastre wrote:
> Bodgan,
>
> Did you have a change to look into this? just curious to know if you
> replicated the problem.
>
> thanks !
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Sebastian Sastre
> <sastre.sebastian at gmail.com <mailto:sastre.sebastian at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Bogdan,
>
> it appears to be broken as of 1.11 and 2.1 yes. I couldn't find
> any more indications in the logs that would point to a visible
> error, but the ACK still has no SDP.
>
> I have a few machines to test this out with the different
> versions, let me know if you want a specific trace or core dump,
> happy to help.
>
> thanks !
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
> Sebastian,
>
> So 1.11 and above are broken in this late ACK generation ? If
> so, I will dig into .
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 18.08.2015 16:20, Sebastian Sastre wrote:
>> Bodgan,
>>
>> Yes , i tried 1.11 and had the same issue, so i went down to
>> 1.8 TLS and it worked right away with the same scenario. A
>> fee config changes but overal its the standrad script.
>>
>> With 1.8 i see the sdp on the Ack and the call connects
>> without problems. Even video.
>>
>> Not sure why it did not work on higher versions.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> You mentioned yesterday on IRC channel that you fixed the
>> problem ?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 17.08.2015 13:40, Sebastian Sastre wrote:
>>> Bodgan,
>>>
>>> Thanks i wasn't sure on the ack process. This is the log
>>> , the scenario is triggered by a httpd json call.
>>>
>>> INFO:b2b_logic:b2bl_add_client: adding entity
>>> [0x7f718dfa7068]->[B2B.173.7331923] to tuple
>>> [0x7f718dfa0cd0]->[685.0]
>>> WARNING:b2b_logic:b2bl_delete_entity: entity
>>> [0x7f718dfa2d18]->[] not found for tuple [685.0]
>>> INFO:b2b_logic:b2bl_delete_entity: delete tuple [685.0],
>>> entity []
>>> INFO:b2b_logic:b2bl_add_client: adding entity
>>> [0x7f718dfa4d28]->[B2B.173.5533781] to tuple
>>> [0x7f718dfa0cd0]->[685.0]
>>> INFO:b2b_logic:b2b_add_dlginfo: Dialog pair:
>>> [B2B.173.7331923] - [B2B.173.5533781]
>>>
>>> and the trace looks like this
>>>
>>> 172.10.1.21 -> 172.10.1.107 SIP 436 Request: INVITE
>>> sip:sebas3 at 172.10.1.107:5060
>>> <http://sip:sebas3@172.10.1.107:5060>
>>> 172.10.1.107 -> 172.10.1.21 SIP 346 Status: 100 Giving a try
>>> 172.10.1.107 -> 172.10.1.21 SIP 456 Status: 180 Ringing
>>> 172.10.1.107 -> 172.10.1.21 SIP/SDP 1088 Status: 200 Ok,
>>> with session description
>>>
>>> 172.10.1.21 -> 172.10.1.20 SIP/SDP 843 Request: INVITE
>>> sip:1 at 172.10.1.20:5060 <http://sip:1@172.10.1.20:5060>,
>>> with session description
>>> 172.10.1.20 -> 172.10.1.21 SIP 390 Status: 100 Trying
>>> 172.10.1.20 -> 172.10.1.21 SIP/SDP 1252 Status: 200 OK,
>>> with session description
>>>
>>> 172.10.1.21 -> 172.10.1.107 SIP 526 Request: ACK
>>> sip:sebas3 at 73.139.116.217
>>> <mailto:sip%3Asebas3 at 73.139.116.217>
>>> 172.10.1.21 -> 172.10.1.20 SIP 446 Request: ACK
>>> sip:1 at 172.10.1.20:5060;transport=udp
>>> <mailto:sip:1 at 172.10.1.20:5060;transport=udp>
>>>
>>> 172.10.1.107 -> 172.10.1.21 SIP 474 Request: BYE
>>> sip:DialerProxy at 172.10.1.21:5060
>>> <http://sip:DialerProxy@172.10.1.21:5060>
>>> 172.10.1.21 -> 172.10.1.20 SIP 446 Request: BYE
>>> sip:1 at 172.10.1.20:5060;transport=udp
>>> <mailto:sip:1 at 172.10.1.20:5060;transport=udp>
>>> 172.10.1.20 -> 172.10.1.21 SIP 545 Status: 200 OK
>>> 172.10.1.21 -> 172.10.1.107 SIP 629 Status: 200 OK
>>>
>>> thanks !
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Sebastian,
>>>
>>> The 200OK from FS must be followed by ACK+SDP to
>>> linphone. See:
>>> http://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Tutorials-B2BUA#toc14
>>>
>>> If this does not happen -> do you see any errors in
>>> the logs (around the processing of 200OK from FS) ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>
>>> On 17.08.2015 04:18, Sebastian Sastre wrote:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> Im using the B2BUA module to send a call out to our
>>>> subscribers and bridge them with our IVR server on
>>>> answer.
>>>>
>>>> The subscriber side uses linphone and the media
>>>> server is a freeswitch 1.6. When placing the call
>>>> thru the trigger scenario MI command, the initial
>>>> invite does not have any SDP inside which makes sense.
>>>>
>>>> Once the 200ok is received from the linphone
>>>> client, opensips uses the SDP contained in the 200
>>>> to generate an invite to the freeswitch box. which
>>>> is great.
>>>>
>>>> However, when the 200ok is received from
>>>> freeswitch, the following ACK back the linphone
>>>> client does not contain the SDP and Linphone
>>>> complains with "No codec intersection" and sends an
>>>> immediate bye.
>>>>
>>>> Am i right to think that the sdp should go in the
>>>> ack to create a late offer?
>>>> Should i be sending a re invite?
>>>>
>>>> any help appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> My scenario is simple.
>>>>
>>>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>>>> <scenario id="dialer" name="MS start conditional"
>>>> param="2" type="extern">
>>>> <init>
>>>> <bridge>
>>>> <client>
>>>> <id>client1</id>
>>>> <destination>
>>>> <value type="param">1</value>
>>>> </destination>
>>>> </client>
>>>> <client>
>>>> <id>client2</id>
>>>> <destination>
>>>> <value type="param">2</value>
>>>> </destination>
>>>> </client>
>>>> </bridge>
>>>> <state>1</state>
>>>> </init>
>>>> </scenario>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>> <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20151211/a261f0f5/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list