[OpenSIPS-Users] rtpproxy vs. STUN/TURN/ICE

[Giovanni Maruzzelli]

Both will work.

You can check other aspects inherently to your project and implementation:
performances, integration, etc

Rttproxy, media engine and the like can give you more services related to
the fact they are controlled by the proxy.

sent from my mobile,
Giovanni Maruzzelli
cell: +39 347 266 56 18
On Aug 29, 2015 7:04 PM, "Nabeel" <nabeelshikder at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry previous message I sent was meant to be a quote.
>
> All my clients will use the same UAC which supports ICE/TURN, so that is
> not an issue.
>
> I just want to know which is more effective solely on the basis of NAT
> traversal ability.
> On 29 Aug 2015 18:01, "Nabeel" <nabeelshikder at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That said, only clients that supports turn will use it, check your
>> clients features.
>>
>> Rtpproxy, mediaengine, and the like do not rely on clients support, they
>> are.enforced by sip proxy manipulation of sdp.
>> On 29 Aug 2015 17:02, "Giovanni Maruzzelli" <gmaruzz at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Stun/turn are the only methods used by webrtc peers, and because are
>>> used through ICE they're very effective.
>>>
>>> You can check coturn for an advanced implementation.
>>>
>>> That said, only clients that supports turn will use it, check your
>>> clients features.
>>>
>>> Rtpproxy, mediaengine, and the like do not rely on clients support, they
>>> are.enforced by sip proxy manipulation of sdp.
>>>
>>> So, actually they (turn and rtpproxy) are not alternative to each other,
>>> but complementary.
>>> Eg: your service can offer both technologies at the same time, clients
>>> choose what to do.
>>>
>>> -giovanni
>>>
>>> sent from my mobile,
>>> Giovanni Maruzzelli
>>> cell: +39 347 266 56 18
>>> On Aug 29, 2015 5:48 PM, "Nabeel" <nabeelshikder at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to know which is more effective for NAT traversal,
>>>> rtpproxy or STUN/TURN/ICE implementation.
>>>>
>>>> I heard that TURN server with one public IP can function equivalent to
>>>> rtpproxy, and TURN server with two public IPs is more effective than
>>>> rtpproxy.
>>>>
>>>> Is that true?
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150829/a4f56f5c/attachment-0001.htm>