[OpenSIPS-Users] rtpproxy vs. STUN/TURN/ICE

[Stefano Pisani]

Stun/Turn/Ice are usefull where Client is behind a NAT and OpenSIPS has 
public IP.
You could use nathelper modules instead of Stun, to set the right IPs in 
the messages from client.
If OpenSIPS is behind a NAT too (it has private IP) you must use 
RTPProxy too with a proper configuration.


Il 29/08/2015 17:47, Nabeel ha scritto:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know which is more effective for NAT traversal, 
> rtpproxy or STUN/TURN/ICE implementation.
>
> I heard that TURN server with one public IP can function equivalent to 
> rtpproxy, and TURN server with two public IPs is more effective than 
> rtpproxy.
>
> Is that true?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150829/e71a3255/attachment.htm>