[OpenSIPS-Users] 408 Request Timeout with UDP
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at opensips.org
Mon Aug 24 18:56:29 CEST 2015
Hi ,
So, is the problem solved (by your findings in the UAS side) ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 24.08.2015 18:25, Nabeel wrote:
> I just discovered that the SIP client logs show an error message only
> on the recipient side, not on the caller's side. I missed this
> previously because the caller's side log does not show any error:
>
> java.lang.Exception: No DNS SRV or A results found for:
> 162.242.153.259 (IP address of OpenSIPS server).
>
>
> I have the SRV records set on the actual hostname/domain, but it seems
> to be looking for SRV at the actual IP address itself.
>
> On 21 August 2015 at 17:57, Nabeel <nabeelshikder at gmail.com
> <mailto:nabeelshikder at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> The log doesn't show any errors when the Timeout occurs, it only
> shows this:
>
> opensips[1842]: ACC: call missed:
> timestamp=1440174643;method=INVITE;from_tag=z9hG4bK04147190;to_tag=;call_id=424618310389 at 10.137.181.237
> <mailto:424618310389 at 10.137.181.237>;code=408;reason=Request
> Timeout
>
>
> This seems to occur sporadically; some calls connect without
> problem but others don't; so perhaps it is a genuine timeout...
> maybe it simply longer to connect on some calls?
>
>
> On 21 August 2015 at 17:46, Nabeel <nabeelshikder at gmail.com
> <mailto:nabeelshikder at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Sorry to bring this up again, but I still get the 408 Request
> Timeout on some calls.
>
> Isn't there just a way to increase the request timeout limit?
>
> Here is the trace:
>
> http://pastebin.com/jvCPGYDu
>
> There is even an ACK in the trace after the request timeout
> message, but the call doesn't connect.
>
> On 7 August 2015 at 18:10, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
> Indeed,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 07.08.2015 20:08, Nabeel wrote:
>> You mean like this, right?
>>
>> if (is_method("REGISTER"))
>>
>> {
>> if ( 0 ) setflag(TCP_PERSISTENT);
>>
>> setbflag(SIP_PING_FLAG);
>>
>> if (!save("location"))
>> sl_reply_error();
>>
>> exit;
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7 August 2015 at 17:52, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nabeel,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 07.08.2015 19:39, Nabeel wrote:
>>> [........]
>>> Bogdan,
>>>
>>> Regarding UDP, I realised that the UDP port could
>>> not be in LISTEN state and this was probably
>>> preventing my server from fully opening that port.
>>> Running nmap on that port showed result
>>> "open|filtered", unlike with TCP which showed fully
>>> open. I am not running any firewalls on my server,
>>> so this seems to be the default behaviour of my network.
>> A bidirectional traffic through the NAT will keep the
>> NAT pinhole open, while a unidirectional one may not.
>> This is the advantage of the SIP pinging versus
>> simple UDP pinging.
>>>
>>> I would like to clarify one thing. You mentioned
>>> adding setbflag(SIP_PING_FLAG) before doing save(),
>>> but in my config file I don't see save() anywhere,
>>> there is only this line: "if (!save("location"))".
>>> Where exactly do I add this line?
>> exactly.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bogdan
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150824/b230b057/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list