[OpenSIPS-Users] opensips1.11 dr_routing

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Denis,

Sowhat you want to do is to be able to serial and parallel (combined) 
having carriers as elements in the list (and not GWs).

With the solution I gave you cannot do it as you cannot usecarriers in 
the definition of another carrier(when doing the parallel group), right ?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 21.08.2015 16:14, dpa wrote:
>
> No, Bogdan, everything fine. You wright understand my question.
>
> I wanted “do a combination between serial and parallel selection” but 
> method you suggest doesn`t fit to me.
>
> The main reason I have many providers and using carrier for “sharing” 
> doesn`t convenient, because I must have all possible combination of 
> carriers and using (remember) it for making routing table (contents of 
> routing table formed by another system, and I do not want complicate it).
>
> Thank you.
>
> *From:*Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at opensips.org]
> *Sent:* Friday, August 21, 2015 3:52 PM
> *To:* dpa; 'OpenSIPS users mailling list'
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips1.11 dr_routing
>
> Denis,
>
> I had the impression that I haven't managed to answer to your 
> question. Maybe because I do not fully understand the question. Could 
> you detail why the solution I gave does not fit you?
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 21.08.2015 15:35, dpa wrote:
>
>     Hello Bogdan!
>
>     I understand and I thought about it before. But it doesn`t fit to
>     me, because I have many prefix which can “sharing” different carriers.
>
>     Anyway, thank you for help.
>
>     *From:*Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at opensips.org]
>     *Sent:* Friday, August 21, 2015 3:29 PM
>     *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list; denis7979 at mail.ru
>     <mailto:denis7979 at mail.ru>
>     *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips1.11 dr_routing
>
>     Hi Denis,
>
>     If you use weights alg and the GW has no weight, a 0 weight will
>     be assumed, so it will never match (unless after a failover).
>
>     Using weights, the selection is over all the GW in the set.
>
>     If you want do a combination between serial and parallel selection
>     , you need to use carriers:
>
>     Make carrier X with wights flags and set for it destinations
>     34=50,35=50
>     and in the rule have the destination set "14,#X" (and do not use
>     the W flag anymore)
>
>     Regards,
>
>
>     Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>
>     OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>
>     http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>     On 21.08.2015 12:16, dpa wrote:
>
>         Hello!
>
>         There is one question about dr_routing module.
>
>         Example 1.
>
>         I have such gw_list “#14,#34=50,#35=50,#2881”
>
>         Example 2.
>
>         I have such gw_list “#14,#34,#35,#2881”
>
>         I am using d_routing() with W flag.
>
>         In Example 1 a call first had been sent to sharing between #34
>         and #35 and only then to #14.
>
>         In Example 2 a call first had been sent to #14, then #34, then
>         #35 and #2881.
>
>         Is there any way to tell Opensips in Example 1 first sends
>         calls to #14 and only then to sharing between #34 and #35?
>
>         Thank you for any help.
>
>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Users mailing list
>
>         Users at lists.opensips.org  <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>
>         http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150821/e45a9afa/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 906 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150821/e45a9afa/attachment-0001.gif>