[OpenSIPS-Users] reply and failure routes

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at opensips.org
Tue Sep 2 18:27:41 CEST 2014


Hi Dmitry,

If for a single SIP reply you arm both failure and reply route, then the 
reply route will be first executed and then the failure route.

For different replies (of the same transaction), the reply route may be 
run in parallel, but failure route not !

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 02.09.2014 11:50, neumann wrote:
> Hello. Would you please let us know how failure and reply routes are 
> performed? In parallel or sequentially? If sequentially, in what 
> order? And is it possible to influence this order?
>
> For instance regarding the route shown below, when in reply to INVITE 
> we get 401 or 407, both routes are activated, and judging by log the 
> route “t_on_reply” is called first and then the route “t_on_failure”. 
> Is it really so and are they performed one after another?
> route[dispatch_out] {
>     ...
>     t_on_failure("rtf_dispatch_out");
>     t_on_reply("auth_reply");
>     t_relay();
>     exit;
> }
>
> Thank you very much. Have a nice day.
>
> ————————————
>
> Timofeev Dmitry
> VoIP Engineer
> Linux, Asterisk, Freeswitch, Cisco solutions
> Skype: itsroot
> icq: 227227933
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140902/23ac94bd/attachment.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list