[OpenSIPS-Users] CDRTool prepaid for big installation
Satish Patel
satish.txt at gmail.com
Sun Oct 12 16:14:07 CEST 2014
Thanks!! I think you got my point, we have very high density call ratio
that is why prepaid not going to be a solution, I think postpaid or quota
would be right one.
I have following question:
Postpaid:
Default it treat all calls as postpaid but in case i want to give number of
mins or time to my single customer then how do i achieve that Example:
5000 mins or say $500 deposit in customer account then how i can do that
with postpaid?
Quota: I never explore this feature so i just want to know how quota
system work with CDRTool? could you give me short explanation? Most of our
customer would be call center or high density call customer, how i can use
quota in that scenario?
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Adrian Georgescu <ag at ag-projects.com>
wrote:
>
> On 12 Oct 2014, at 09:48, Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have run sipp test and it only able to handle 30 calls and later all
> call failed,
>
>
> Can you explain what exactly failed?
>
> I heard from other user post, CDRTool prepaid can't handle many
> simultaneous running calls.
>
>
> You heard wrong. It cannot handle high density call attempts like calls
> generated from call centers or transit peers like SIP trunks that push lot
> of calls. The number of simultaneous calls is irrelevant. You can have
> thousands of simultaneous calls with almost no performance penalty if the
> traffic is generated by regular SIP user devices.
>
> In our case single account will make many simultaneous calls and we need
> to handle them via prepaid..
>
>
> It all depends on the meaning of many. Whenever a new call is attempted,
> the maximum remaining time of all ongoing calls of the same user must be
> recalculated so that the balance cannot be exceeded for any of them. This
> means that the more calls for the same user you have, the longer it takes
> to calculated everything over and over again.
>
> If you have many users with a few calls each like in a residential
> scenario where a user makes one or perhaps two parallel calls, this would
> have little impact as there is little to re-calculate.
>
> Some one suggested don't use prepaid because of limitation and
> performance, and suggested use Postpaid or Quota system.. is that true?
>
>
> It all depends on the traffic patterns. Concurrent or simultaneous calls
> is one thing, high density calls/per second attempts is another. There is
> no hard limitation but the number of database queries, distance to MySQL
> database will affect how many calls you can handle because as I explained
> before all concurrent calls must be rerated in real time again for each new
> call attempt. If one SIP account generates 10K parallel calls the load is
> infinite while if you have 10K users with one call each the load is almost
> zero.
>
> This is why a prepaid model is not practical for high density of calls and
> this has little to do with CDRTool, any other system would face the same
> problem, the load is compounded when adding more calls for same account. A
> quota based system is more appropriate for entities that generate large
> amount of calls as nothing has to be calculated on a per call basis.
>
> Adrian
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:46 PM, <ag at ag-projects.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, it is capable.
>>
>> On 08 Oct 2014, at 15:42, Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Just want to know does CDRTool prepaid capable of handling couple
>> hundreds of concurrent calls? I heard it can handle only 2/3 concurrent
>> calls per account? what is the solution if we want to host big prepaid
>> system with thousands of users?
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Users mailing list
>> > Users at lists.opensips.org
>> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> --
> Adrian
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141012/6f83c867/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list