[OpenSIPS-Users] Fwd: RTPproxy project

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hello,

As always, the truth is in the middle.

I agree RTPP is behind on certain things (and this is why we want to do 
them), but on the other hand it is a good platform with other good 
features (missing on the other relays). RTPP has better ability in 
individually controlling the stream (audio /video), ability to set 
timeouts and onhold with no conflicts, ability to generates events on 
timeout, more flexibility in handling symmetric / asymmetric NATs, 
ability to do media injection (playback), ability to do call recording

What neither  mediaproxy, nor rtpengine have is a mechanism for 
implementing RTP failover (for ongoing calls) or restart persistence . 
This is something we want to look into. I would love to have ICE and 
WebRTC on my media relay, for the HA and persistence are more important 
I would say.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 24.05.2014 01:59, Muhammad Shahzad Shafi wrote:
>
> To be honest, i have stopped using rtpproxy for over 2 years now. It 
> is not evolving as fast as it should be, specially in the context of 
> ICE and WebRTC technologies.
>
> I would like to suggest that opensips team should consider adding 
> support for rtpengine from SIPWise,
>
> https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine
>
> For now mediaproxy from AG Projects is the only good choice for 
> handling media in opensips with ICE support (though it still lacks 
> WebRTC features).
>
> Thank you.
>
> On 2014-05-23 14:55, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>
>> Going for a public exposure on this question to Maxim, maybe we will 
>> get an answer here.
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: 	RTPproxy project
>> Date: 	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:03:31 +0300
>> From: 	Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> To: 	Maxim Sobolev
>> CC: 	Razvan Crainea
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Maxim,
>>
>> Long time, no talks, but I hope everything is fine on your side.
>>
>> I'm reaching you in order to ask about your future plans in regards to
>> the rtpproxy project? We see no much activity around it and other media
>> relays are popping around.
>>
>> RTPP is an essential component for us, we invested a lot of work, we
>> have many patches (extensions) for it (which we want to push to the
>> public tree, but there is no answer on this) and we are also looking for
>> investing a lot into big future plans (as adding more functionalities).
>>
>> Now, my question is - what is your commitment and disponibility for the
>> RTPP project ? depending on that we what to re-position ourselves, as we
>> do not want to waste time and work on things which are out of control.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> -- 
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>>
> -- 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> Muhammad Shahzad
> -----------------------------------
> CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
> CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
> Cell: +49 176 99 83 10 85
> MSN: shari_786pk at hotmail.com
> Email: shaheryarkh at googlemail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140525/c3c34deb/attachment.htm>