[OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.9.1 accounting

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at opensips.org
Thu Mar 27 18:51:55 CET 2014


Hi,

You should have 2 records (as it is a call which did not established) :
1 - one as missed call, because of the missed call flag
2 - one as normal call (the db_flag+cdr_flag) in combination with the 
"failed_transaction_flag"

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 26.03.2014 09:56, dpa wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> In attachment you can find ordinary call (not successful)
>
> 1.1.1.1-- SIP UA
>
> 1.1.1.2-- Opensips
>
> 1.1.1.3-- SIP UA
>
> In opensips.cfg
>
> "modparam("acc", "early_media", 0)
>
> modparam("acc", "report_cancels", 1)
>
> modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 1)
>
> modparam("acc", "db_flag", 15)
>
> modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", 16)
>
> modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 17)
>
> modparam("acc", "db_table_acc", "acc")
>
> modparam("acc", "db_table_missed_calls", "acc")
>
> modparam("acc", "cdr_flag", 22)"
>
> and
>
> before INVITE will be translated to callee SIP UA
>
> "  setflag(15);
>
>   setflag(16);
>
>   setflag(17);
>
>   setflag(22);"
>
> I see that Opensips tried to insert several entries into acc.
>
> The question is, why did Opensips try to insert into acc several 
> entries due to one call? Is this because of db_flag and 
> failed_transaction_flag?
>
> Thank you for any help.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140327/60fa0544/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 906 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140327/60fa0544/attachment-0001.gif>


More information about the Users mailing list