[OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips1.7 with MediaProxy

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi.

So the 200 OK for INVITE is not matching anymore ? If so, this is not 
related to dialog module - the reply matching has nothing to do with the 
dialog module as it is done by the TM module. Maybe your problem is in a 
different place.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 07.03.2014 17:05, H Yavari wrote:
> Hi,
> OK with SDP and BYE.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
> *To:* H Yavari <hyavari at rocketmail.com>; OpenSIPS users mailling list 
> <users at lists.opensips.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, 7 March 2014, 17:46:23
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips1.7 with MediaProxy
>
> Hi,
>
> Which SIP message is no longer matching the dialog ?
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com  <http://www.opensips-solutions.com/>
> On 06.03.2014 11:49, H Yavari wrote:
>> Hi Bogdan,
>> Can you give us some example?
>> I use opensips with rtpproxy. but when I use the topology_hiding(), 
>> dialogs not matched and OK with SDP not received to the call party 
>> and media path not established.
>> Thanks so.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> H.Yavari
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org> 
>> <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>
>> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org> 
>> <mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>; lav at ptcomm.ru <mailto:lav at ptcomm.ru>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 5 March 2014, 20:18:30
>> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips1.7 with MediaProxy
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The best options for you is to use dialog module with topology 
>> hiding. This can be easily combined with any of the media relays 
>> (rtpproxy or mediaproxy) for hiding the media path.
>>
>> If you have any particular questions on the setup, I will try to help 
>> you.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com  <http://www.opensips-solutions.com/>
>> On 25.02.2014 09:26, Лытаев Антон Викторович wrote:
>>
>> Hi. Please help.
>> We have:
>> 1.One server consists of: CenOS6.5 + Opensips1.7 + MediaProxy2.5
>> 2.One MGW: Cisco AS5350
>> 3.UserID=telephone number and registration on OpenSips through MySQL
>> 4.Call to PSTN pass through MGW with prefix 9999:
>> route[4] {      prefix("9999");
>>       rewritehostport("192.168.0.3: 5060 <http://192.168.0.3:5060/>");
>>       if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); };
>>         exit;}
>>
>> Now, such a scheme works:
>>
>> (UAC )---->sip----->Opensips 1.7--->SIP--->MGW Cisco
>> 192.168.0.65 192.168.0.2 192.168.0.3
>> RTP---------------------------
>> ------------------------------ -->MGW Cisco-------->PSTN
>>
>> In this topology visible
>>
>> It's not safe, it's necessary to build a new wiring diagram:
>> (UAC  )--->sip,RTP---->(Opensips--- >rtp,SIP------>)----->MGW 
>> Cisco--->PSTN
>> 85.85.85.85 (85.85.85.2     192.168.0.2) 192.168.0.3
>>
>> questions:
>> 1. to hide the network topology from the users (can be used dialog 
>> module, function: topology_hiding?)
>> 2. hide RTP traffic to MGW for Opensips-server (can be used 
>> MediaProxy or rtpproxy)?
>> Please, give examples opensips.cfg-file ?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org  <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140324/28aef1ce/attachment-0001.htm>