[OpenSIPS-Users] Presence: "xmlns" attributes inside <tuple> element not compliant to RFC3863

[Saúl Ibarra Corretgé]

Hi,

On Mar 10, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Martin Stock wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> I updated my OpenSIPS server from version 1.6.4 to version 1.10. Nearly everything is working. I only have some problems with the presence stuff: IMHO the structure of XML presence object is not correct.
> 
> Working presence body (OpenSIPS 1.6.4):
> --- SNIP ---
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" xmlns:rp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid" entity="sip:10 at domain">
>    <tuple id="t48d84e51">
>        <status>
>            <basic>closed</basic>
>        </status>
>        <dm:person id="t48d84e51">
>        <status>
>            <basic>open</basic>
>        </status>
>        <rp:activities>
>            <rp:Away/>
>        </rp:activities>
>        </dm:person>
>        <timestamp>2014-03-07T16:49:30Z</timestamp>
>    </tuple>
> </presence>
> --- SNAP ---
> 
> Bad presence body (OpenSIPS 1.10):
> --- SNIP ---
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" entity="sip:10 at domain">
>    <tuple xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" xmlns:rp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid" id="t1e8c1196">
>        <status>
>            <basic>closed</basic>
>        </status>
>        <dm:person id="t1e8c1196">
>        <status>
>            <basic>open</basic>
>        </status>
>        <rp:activities>
>            <rp:Away/>
>        </rp:activities>
>        </dm:person>
>        <timestamp>2014-03-07T16:50:21Z</timestamp>
>    </tuple>
> </presence>
> --- SNAP ---
> 
> 
> With OpenSIPS 1.10 the namespace attributes are not defined inside the <presence> element. Referring to RFC3863, Section 4.1.1 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3863#page-5) IMHO this is not intended.

I'm not sure what you mean. What attributes are not defined?

> Also the encoding Header is missing. This is a bad style.
> 

I'm not sure when the encoding went, but yes, it should have been there, that's a bug.

> I don't find any UA that works with this <presence> element.
> 

Any client based on SIP SIMPLE Client SDK (such as Blink) works with those documents.

> Is this a bug or are there options to tweak this?
> 

What do you need to tweak? (the encoding bug aside)


Regards,

--
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects