[OpenSIPS-Users] Second call on transferred with B2B refer scenario

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at opensips.org
Mon Jun 16 17:25:28 CEST 2014


Hi Santi,

Thanks for the logs - now I understand you want to put an attended 
transfer through OpenSIPS, but attended (handled by OpenSIPS) does not 
work (only un-attended or REFER pass through).
Do you want OpenSIPS to handle the attended transfer, or you want to be 
transparent and allow the end point to handle it ?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 16.06.2014 11:48, Santi Antón wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> Next you can find a link to Refer log.
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3db2bUGbNDQT2F1cDlQNlF2aVU/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Regards,
>
>   
> Santi Antón
>   Responsable de operaciones
>
> Tel. 902 520 520 ext 106
> Fax. 93 589 14 90
>
> santi.anton at quarea.com
>   
>
>
>
>
>
>   
> 902 520 520
> www.quarea.com
> Quarea ITC Management & Consulting
> Su experto en Redes Voz-Datos IP:
> Asterisk, Cisco, Polycom, Colt Telecom
>   
>
>
>
> Este mensaje está dirigido únicamente a su destinatario. Contiene información CONFIDENCIAL sometida a secreto profesional o cuya divulgación está prohibida por la ley. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, debe saber que su lectura, copia y uso no están autorizados. Le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. El correo electrónico vía Internet no permite asegurar la confidencialidad de los mensajes que se transmiten ni su integridad o correcta recepción. QUAREA no asume responsabilidad por estas circunstancias y se reserva el derecho a ejercer las acciones legales que le correspondan contra todo tercero que acceda de forma ilegítima al contenido de este mensaje y al de los ficheros contenidos en el mismo. Si el destinatario de este mensaje no consintiera la utilización del correo electrónico vía Internet y la grabación de los mensajes, rogamos lo ponga en nuestro conocimiento de forma inmediata.
> De conformidad con la LOPD y la LSSICE, le informamos que su correo electrónico forma parte de nuestra BBDD de contactos con la finalidad de enviarle información de nuestros productos. Puede ejercer sus derechos de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición dirigiendo un escrito a infodat at quarea.com indicando en el asunto LOPD.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at opensips.org]
> Enviado el: viernes, 13 de junio de 2014 13:25
> Para: OpenSIPS users mailling list; Santi Antón
> Asunto: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Second call on transferred with B2B refer scenario
>
> Hi Santi,
>
> Indeed there is no new Refer-To hdr in the resulting INVITE (frame 38).
> As you can reproduce it, could you please run in full debug (debug=4) and send me the logs corresponding to the REFER processing ?
>
> Thank and Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 11.06.2014 13:06, Santi Antón wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Nobody else had found the same issue trying refer scenario with b2b module? Someone has a valid opensips.cfg to compare it with mine?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Santi Antón
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: Santi Antón
>> Enviado el: miércoles, 04 de junio de 2014 11:04
>> Para: OpenSIPS users mailling list; 'Bogdan-Andrei Iancu'
>> Asunto: RE: [OpenSIPS-Users] Second call on transferred with B2B refer
>> scenario
>>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> Do you need my opensips.cfg? It seems very strange that this issue could be general, I think that maybe I'm making a mistake in opensips configuration.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    
>> Santi Antón
>>
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: users-bounces at lists.opensips.org
>> [mailto:users-bounces at lists.opensips.org] En nombre de Santi Antón
>> Enviado el: miércoles, 28 de mayo de 2014 9:35
>> Para: 'Bogdan-Andrei Iancu'; OpenSIPS users mailling list
>> Asunto: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Second call on transferred with B2B refer
>> scenario
>>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> Yes, it is.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>>    
>> Santi Antón
>>
>>
>>> -----Mensaje original-----
>>> De: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at opensips.org] Enviado el:
>>> miércoles, 28 de mayo de 2014 8:15
>>> Para: OpenSIPS users mailling list; Santi Antón
>>> Asunto: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Second call on transferred with B2B
>>> refer scenario
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You mean the frame 38 in your trace, right ? Indeed the TO should have only the URI, not the REPLACE stuff ....I will look into.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>
>>> On 27.05.2014 17:10, Santi Antón wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I noticed that INVITE with Replaces header is built like this:
>>>
>>> INVITE sip:9442 at 172.16.50.131:5063 SIP/2.0
>>> Record-Route: <sip:172.16.53.59;lr>
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.53.59:5060;branch=z9hG4bK4867.fe529da6.0
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.53.59:5060;branch=z9hG4bK4867.ee529da6.0
>>> To:
>>> sip:9442 at 172.16.53.59?Replaces=377952018%40172.16.51.138%3Bto-tag%3DB
>>> 2
>>> B.124.358%3Bfrom-tag%3D741375670
>>> From:
>>> <sip:9443 at 172.16.53.59;transport=UDP>;tag=fde67a95c41efd29d5eb8ddaecd
>>> b
>>> abf0-9cb9
>>> CSeq: 4 INVITE
>>> Call-ID: B2B.345.6691153
>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>> Content-Length: 376
>>> User-Agent: OpenSIPS (1.10.1-notls (x86_64/linux))
>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>> Supported: replaces, norefersub, extended-refer, timer,
>>> X-cisco-serviceuri
>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS,
>>> INFO, SUBSCRIBE
>>> Contact: <sip:172.16.53.59:5060>
>>>
>>>
>>> The replaces header is inside "To" header, is it correct? The examples I saw the Replaces header has an independent header like next:
>>>
>>> F6 INVITE Transferee -> Transfer Target
>>>
>>> INVITE sips:482n4z24kdg at chicago.example.com;gr=8594958 SIP/2.0
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.0.2.4;branch=z9hG4bKnaslu82
>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>> To: <sips:482n4z24kdg at chicago.example.com;gr=8594958>
>>> From: <sips:transferee at biloxi.example.com>;tag=954
>>> Call-ID: kmzwdle3dl3d08
>>> CSeq: 41 INVITE
>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY
>>> Supported: gruu, replaces, tdialog
>>> Contact: <sips:3ld812adkjw at biloxi.example.com;gr=3413kj2ha>
>>> Replaces: 592435881734450904;to-tag=9m2n3wq;from-tag=763231
>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>> Content-Length: ...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Santi Antón
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Mensaje original-----
>>>> De: Santi Antón
>>>> Enviado el: lunes, 26 de mayo de 2014 9:46
>>>> Para: 'users at lists.opensips.org'; 'Bogdan-Andrei Iancu'
>>>> Asunto: RV: [OpenSIPS-Users] Second call on transferred with B2B
>>>> refer scenario
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I forget to attach the file. Next you can find a link to pcap.
>>>>
>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3db2bUGbNDQWFIzSjhoVFFKVUk/edit?us
>>>> p
>>>> =sharing
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>     
>>>> Santi Antón
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Mensaje original-----
>>>> De: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at opensips.org] Enviado el:
>>>> jueves, 22 de mayo de 2014 18:29
>>>> Para: users at lists.opensips.org; Santi Antón
>>>> Asunto: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Second call on transferred with B2B
>>>> refer scenario
>>>>
>>>> Hello Santi,
>>>>
>>>> There is nothing attached and it is not a good practice to have large attachments on the mailing lists (as you are flooding the inboxes).
>>>> Better uploade your trace on a pastebin like side (or store pcap on ftp/http servers) and just post the link.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>
>>>> On 22.05.2014 13:28, Santi Antón wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to implement attendant transfer capability to our Opensips server with the b2b module and refer.xml scenario.
>>>> Attended transfer works fine except the transferred receives a new call rather than update the ongoing call with transferor.
>>>> Looking for the cause I saw that from tag is different between the initial call (INVITE) to transferred and the from tag in Replaces header (INVITE). I think the two from tag have to be the same to consider the second INVITE an update and not a new call.
>>>> Attached you can find a capture with an isolated example (9443 calls 9441 and does an attended transfer to 9442).
>>>> Maybe I'm not understanding the module behavior but I couldn't find any clue in module's documentation.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>      
>>>> Santi Antón
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>





More information about the Users mailing list