[OpenSIPS-Users] VIA relay error using mhomed=1
qasimakhan at gmail.com
qasimakhan at gmail.com
Fri May 24 15:58:45 CEST 2013
Dear Bodgan,
This is what i am doing for ACK path (This is minus all the other crap like
auth, redis stuff). I dont think that there would be any loop here.
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
if (is_method("REGISTER")) {
fix_nated_register();
} else {
fix_nated_contact();
};
}
force_rport();
if (loose_route()) {
if (loose_route()) {
# route it out to whatever destination was set by loose_route()
# in $du (destination URI).
route(2);
}
} else {
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if (t_check_trans()) {
t_relay();
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
}
route[2] {
if (is_direction("downstream")) {
xlog("L_NOTICE", "[$pr:$fU@$si:$sp]: Sequencial '$rm' request from
caller '$fU' for call from '$fu' to '$ru' \n");
} else {
xlog("L_NOTICE", "[$pr:$fU@$si:$sp]: Sequencial '$rm' request from
callee '$fU' for call from '$ru' to '$fu' \n");
};
if(is_method("ACK")) {
$avp(pdd) = 0;
$avp(pdd) = $Ts - $(avp(pdd){s.int});
xlog("L_NOTICE", "[$pr:$fU@$si:$sp]: Post Dial Delay of Call-ID '$ci'
from '$fu' to '$ru' is '$avp(pdd)' at '$time(%F %T %Z)' \n");
}
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
}
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
<bogdan at opensips.org>wrote:
> **
> No, it is not a retransmission as it is the same process and there is no
> second set of logs for receiving a message from network:
>
> May 20 11:34:52 jkt-svr-mvapp-2 rtsip-service[1411]: DBG:core:parse_msg:
> SIP Request:
> May 20 11:34:52 jkt-svr-mvapp-2 rtsip-service[1411]: DBG:core:parse_msg:
> method: <ACK>
> May 20 11:34:52 jkt-svr-mvapp-2 rtsip-service[1411]: DBG:core:parse_msg:
> uri:
> <sip:622190004002 at xx.xx.xx.xx:2374;transport=UDP;rinstance=77930ffd530697a7;nat=yes>
> May 20 11:34:52 jkt-svr-mvapp-2 rtsip-service[1411]: DBG:core:parse_msg:
> version: <SIP/2.0>
> ....
> May 20 11:34:52 jkt-svr-mvapp-2 rtsip-service[1411]: DBG:core:receive_msg:
> preparing to run routing scripts...
> ...
> May 20 11:34:52 jkt-svr-mvapp-2 rtsip-service[1411]: DBG:rr:after_loose:
> Topmost route URI: '
> sip:622190004002 at xx.xx.xx.xx:6000;lr;ftag=2e76e266;did=c7c.34372c92' is me
> ...
> May 20 11:34:52 jkt-svr-mvapp-2 rtsip-service[1411]: [
> udp:622190004001 at 39.42.183.233:7085]: Sequencial 'ACK' request from
> caller '622......' for call from .......
> ....
> May 20 11:34:52 jkt-svr-mvapp-2 rtsip-service[1411]: DBG:rr:after_loose:
> Topmost route URI: '
> sip:622190004002 at xx.xx.xx.xx:6000;lr;ftag=2e76e266;did=c7c.34372c92' is me
> ...
> May 20 11:34:52 jkt-svr-mvapp-2 rtsip-service[1411]: [
> udp:622190004001 at 39.42.183.233:7085]: Sequencial 'ACK' request from
> caller '622.....' for call from ........
>
>
> It is clearly a loop.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>
> On 05/22/2013 03:21 PM, qasimakhan at gmail.com wrote:
>
> I think that is retransmission of ACK packet because it didn't get its 200
> ok back.
>
> Regards,
> Qasim
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Qasim,
>>
>> Looking at the ACK related logs, I see you get the script log
>> Sequencial 'ACK' request from caller '622190004001' for call from
>> .....
>>
>> twice - also the logs from the loose_route() function - I suspect you
>> loop somehow in your script and a route is triggered twice (the route doing
>> loose_route)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>>
>> On 05/20/2013 02:46 PM, qasimakhan at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bodgan,
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply as i was traveling this weekend. Please find
>> attached call logs with debug mode 4.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Qasim
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <
>> bogdan at opensips.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Funny, as I do not see anything wrong on a first look - while running
>>> in debug mode (4), please send me the logs corresponding to the ACK
>>> processing.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/17/2013 02:34 PM, qasimakhan at gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please find attached trace. This is server on Public IP that is why i
>>> cannot send the trace on the list. I am listening to IP's as follows
>>>
>>> listen=udp:202.152.203.195:5060
>>> listen=udp:202.152.203.195:6000
>>> listen=udp:192.168.226.142:5060
>>> listen=udp:192.168.226.142:6000
>>>
>>> disable_tcp=no
>>> listen=tcp:202.152.203.195:5060
>>> listen=tcp:202.152.203.195:6000
>>> listen=tcp:192.168.226.142:5060
>>> listen=tcp:192.168.226.142:6000
>>>
>>> If you need anything else i would be happy to provide it to you.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Qasim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <
>>> bogdan at opensips.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Qasim,
>>>>
>>>> So you have multiple interfaces in OpenSIPS - are all of them the same
>>>> protocol ?
>>>>
>>>> Please try to post a SIP capture of the full call, to see how the RR
>>>> part is done.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/16/2013 01:07 PM, qasimakhan at gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On further investigation i see that i only face this issue when both
>>>> caller and callee are on the same network. If both are on separate network
>>>> it works fine.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Qasim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:05 PM, qasimakhan at gmail.com <
>>>> qasimakhan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Qasim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <
>>>>> bogdan at opensips.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> And do you have UDP 202.152.203.195 port 6000 as listener defined
>>>>>> in OpenSIPS ??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/16/2013 12:32 PM, qasimakhan at gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bodgan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes i see the following route header in my packet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Route:
>>>>>> <sip:622190004002 at 202.152.203.195:6000;lr;ftag=3b710c25;did=e55.a77ff685>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yes i am routing it through loose_route.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Qasim
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <
>>>>>> bogdan at opensips.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Qasim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The ACK should be routed via loose_route() based on the "Route"
>>>>>>> headers from it. Could you check if the Route hdrs (from the ACK) are
>>>>>>> correctly reflecting your opensips interfaces ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/14/2013 07:55 AM, qasimakhan at gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am using OpenSIPs in Public<->Private bridging mode and have
>>>>>>> enabled mhomed=1. But the problem is that when we have a call in which both
>>>>>>> parties are on Public interface the INVITE gets relayed properly but and
>>>>>>> ACK of that invite gives the following error.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ERROR:core:get_out_socket: no socket found
>>>>>>> ERROR:core:forward_request: cannot forward to af 2, proto 1 no
>>>>>>> correspondinglistening socket
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Qasim
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130524/d3b041f8/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list