[OpenSIPS-Users] VIA relay error using mhomed=1

[qasimakhan at gmail.com]

yes.

Regards,
Qasim


On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>wrote:

> **
> And do you have UDP 202.152.203.195 port 6000 as listener defined in
> OpenSIPS ??
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>
> On 05/16/2013 12:32 PM, qasimakhan at gmail.com wrote:
>
>  Hi Bodgan,
>
>  Yes i see the following route header in my packet.
>
> Route:
> <sip:622190004002 at 202.152.203.195:6000;lr;ftag=3b710c25;did=e55.a77ff685>
>
>
>  And yes i am routing it through loose_route.
>
>  Regards,
> Qasim
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org
> > wrote:
>
>>  Hello Qasim,
>>
>> The ACK should be routed via loose_route() based on the "Route" headers
>> from it. Could you check if the Route hdrs (from the ACK) are correctly
>> reflecting your opensips interfaces ?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>>
>> On 05/14/2013 07:55 AM, qasimakhan at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>   Hi,
>>
>>  I am using OpenSIPs in Public<->Private bridging mode and have enabled
>> mhomed=1. But the problem is that when we have a call in which both parties
>> are on Public interface the INVITE gets relayed properly but and ACK of
>> that invite gives the following error.
>>
>> ERROR:core:get_out_socket: no socket found
>> ERROR:core:forward_request: cannot forward to af 2, proto 1 no
>> correspondinglistening socket
>>
>>  Regards,
>> Qasim
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130516/438e0f6a/attachment.htm>