[OpenSIPS-Users] RTPProxy for users behind NAT.
qasimakhan at gmail.com
qasimakhan at gmail.com
Tue May 14 06:50:30 CEST 2013
Hi Razvan,
Thanks for your replies but i figured that i was using wrong flags along
with ie. Its working fine after fixing the flags.
Regards,
Qasim
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Răzvan Crainea <razvan at opensips.org> wrote:
> Hi, Qasim!
>
> I am not sure what's your problem then. Are you saying that the SDP is
> properly changed for both Invite and 200 OK? Can you send a trace? Or at
> least explain exactly how each message (INVITE and 200 OK) is sent out by
> OpenSIPS.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Razvan Crainea
> OpenSIPS Core Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.**com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>
>
> On 05/10/2013 06:41 AM, qasimakhan at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Yes exactly that is being done perfectly but what i want to do is to
>> handle NAT on client's end. The IP of client that comes in the SDP's c=
>> param is his local IP address and rtpproxy swaps that IP with server's
>> local IP but on the other way arround it tries to send the IP back to
>> client's local IP address which is not visible to server.
>>
>> Actually we have two nated acenerios. One on the server end and the
>> other on the client's end.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Qasim
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Răzvan Crainea <razvan at opensips.org
>> <mailto:razvan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Qasim!
>>
>> Basically this is what the rtpproxy module does: when you call
>> rtpproxy_offer("ei") function, opensips tells the rtpproxy server
>> that a new session has to be created and the media flow will be from
>> external to internal. Rtpproxy assigns the proper interface(IP) and
>> port and returns them to OpenSIPS, which advertises in the ongoing
>> INVITE. So, considering the rtpproxy server has been configured
>> correctly, all you have to do is call rtpproxy_offer() with the
>> proper direction.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Razvan Crainea
>> OpenSIPS Core Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.**__com <http://www.opensips-**
>> solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>>
>>
>> On 05/09/2013 02:54 PM, qasimakhan at gmail.com
>>
>> <mailto:qasimakhan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Razvan,
>>
>> My scenerio is like this
>>
>> Client <-------> NAT <-------> OpenSIPs/RTPProxy <-------> Client
>>
>>
>> in this scenerio left side of OpenSIPs is public side and the
>> right side
>> is on private network. Secondly i have tried using
>> rtpproxy_offer/answer() but the same problem. I will try using
>> rtpproxy_offer/answer() again in a bit more detail now specially
>> after
>> hearing about problems in engage_rtpproxy in brigding mode. Now
>> can you
>> point me how i can achieve nat handling in rtpproxy module?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Qasim
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Răzvan Crainea
>> <razvan at opensips.org <mailto:razvan at opensips.org>
>> <mailto:razvan at opensips.org <mailto:razvan at opensips.org>>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Qasim!
>>
>> There are two problems with your approach: the first one is
>> that you
>> are using the engage_rtp_proxy() function in a bridging mode
>> scenario. The behavior of this is undefined, because the
>> rtpproxy
>> module cannot fully determine your scenario (for example
>> what's the
>> direction of the media flow in the reply). That's why you
>> should use
>> the rtpproxy_offer() and rtpproxy_answer() functions to
>> explicitly
>> indicate the direction in INVITE and replies.
>> The second problem is that you try to change the SDP twice:
>> first by
>> the fix_nated_sdp() and then by engage_rtp_proxy(). These
>> changes
>> confuse OpenSIPS, who tries to apply both of them. Try to
>> use only
>> one. My suggestion is to rtpproxy_offer/answer() to fix the
>> SDP,
>> without calling fix_nated_sdp().
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Razvan Crainea
>> OpenSIPS Core Developer
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130514/5e3f4646/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list